Atom x5-E3930 vs Core 2 Duo T9800

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x5-E3930 vs Core 2 Duo T9800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x5-E3930 vs Core 2 Duo T9800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x5-E3930

2016

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 500, while Core 2 Duo T9800 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,185 vs 1,189).

Core 2 Duo T9800

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 6W instead of 7W, a 1W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x5-E3930 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo T9800 better than Atom x5-E3930?

Yes. Core 2 Duo T9800 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 2 Duo T9800 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo T9800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo T9800 still makes the most sense overall. Core 2 Duo T9800 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x5-E3930 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom x5-E3930 vs Core 2 Duo T9800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x5-E3930

The Atom x5-E3930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $69.

Core 2 Duo T9800

The Core 2 Duo T9800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 2.92 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,189 points. Launch price was $530.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Atom x5-E3930 and Core 2 Duo T9800 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Atom x5-E3930 versus 2.92 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T9800 — a 47.5% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T9800 (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The Atom x5-E3930 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T9800 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x5-E3930 scores 1,185 against the Core 2 Duo T9800's 1,189 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo T9800. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom x5-E3930 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T9800.

Feature	Atom x5-E3930	Core 2 Duo T9800
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.92 GHz+62%
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	2.93 GHz+125%
L3 Cache	0 kB	6 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)	6 MB+200%
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,185	1,189

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x5-E3930 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo T9800 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Atom x5-E3930	Core 2 Duo T9800
Socket	FCBGA1296	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—