Atom x5-E3930 vs Pentium E5800

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x5-E3930 vs Pentium E5800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x5-E3930 vs Pentium E5800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x5-E3930

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 500, while Pentium E5800 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,185 vs 1,190).

Pentium E5800

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $64 MSRP, while Atom x5-E3930 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌900% higher power demand at 65W vs 6.5W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x5-E3930 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium E5800 better than Atom x5-E3930?

Yes. Pentium E5800 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium E5800 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium E5800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium E5800 is the better buy right now. Pentium E5800 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $64 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (18.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x5-E3930 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom x5-E3930 vs Pentium E5800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x5-E3930

The Atom x5-E3930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium E5800

The Pentium E5800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 November 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,190 points. Launch price was $68.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Atom x5-E3930 and Pentium E5800 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Atom x5-E3930 versus 3.2 GHz on the Pentium E5800 — a 56% clock advantage for the Pentium E5800 (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Atom x5-E3930 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium E5800 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x5-E3930 scores 1,185 against the Pentium E5800's 1,190 — a 0.4% lead for the Pentium E5800. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom x5-E3930	Pentium E5800
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	3.2 GHz+78%
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	3.2 GHz+146%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)	2 MB (total)
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,185	1,190

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x5-E3930 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium E5800 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Atom x5-E3930	Pentium E5800
Socket	FCBGA1296	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—