Atom x5-E3930 vs Pentium A1018

Intel

Atom x5-E3930

2 Cores2 Thrd6.5 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2016
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium A1018

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WW2013
Similar parts
·······

Atom x5-E3930 vs Pentium A1018 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x5-E3930 vs Pentium A1018 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x5-E3930 vs Pentium A1018: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x5-E3930

2016

Why buy it

  • Draws 7W instead of 35W, a 29W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 500, while Pentium A1018 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,185 vs 1,188).

Pentium A1018

2013

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Launch MSRP is still $132 MSRP, while Atom x5-E3930 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
    • 438.5% higher power demand at 35W vs 6.5W.
    • No integrated graphics, while Atom x5-E3930 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Pentium A1018 better than Atom x5-E3930?
    Yes. Pentium A1018 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Pentium A1018 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium A1018 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Pentium A1018 is the better buy right now. Pentium A1018 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $132 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Atom x5-E3930 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Atom x5-E3930 vs Pentium A1018 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Atom x5-E3930

    The Atom x5-E3930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $69.

    Intel

    Pentium A1018

    The Pentium A1018 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,188 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    Both the Atom x5-E3930 and Pentium A1018 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Atom x5-E3930 is built on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. In PassMark, the Atom x5-E3930 scores 1,185 against the Pentium A1018's 1,188 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium A1018. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Atom x5-E3930 vs 1 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Pentium A1018.

    FeatureAtom x5-E3930Pentium A1018
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    1.8 GHz
    Base Clock
    1.3 GHz
    2.1 GHz+62%
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    1 MB Intel® Smart Cache
    L2 Cache
    2 MB (total)
    Process
    14 nm-36%
    22 nm
    Architecture
    Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
    PassMark
    1,185
    1,188
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Atom x5-E3930 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium A1018 uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureAtom x5-E3930Pentium A1018
    Socket
    FCBGA1296
    PGA988
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3L-1866
    Max RAM Capacity
    8 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    ECC Support
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    4
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    The Atom x5-E3930 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 500), while the Pentium A1018 requires a dedicated GPU.

    FeatureAtom x5-E3930Pentium A1018
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Intel HD Graphics 500