Atom x5-E3930 vs Celeron M 723

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x5-E3930 vs Celeron M 723 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x5-E3930 vs Celeron M 723: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x5-E3930

2016

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 500, while Celeron M 723 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌550% higher power demand at 6.5W vs 1W.

Celeron M 723

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 7W, a 6W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,180 vs 1,185).
❌Launch MSRP is still $161 MSRP, while Atom x5-E3930 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom x5-E3930 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom x5-E3930 better than Celeron M 723?

Yes. Atom x5-E3930 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom x5-E3930 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom x5-E3930 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom x5-E3930 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Atom x5-E3930 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $161 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron M 723 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 0.4% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x5-E3930 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom x5-E3930 vs Celeron M 723 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x5-E3930

The Atom x5-E3930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron M 723

The Celeron M 723 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,180 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x5-E3930 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron M 723 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Atom x5-E3930 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Atom x5-E3930 versus 1.2 GHz on the Celeron M 723 — a 40% clock advantage for the Atom x5-E3930. The Atom x5-E3930 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron M 723 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x5-E3930 scores 1,185 against the Celeron M 723's 1,180 — a 0.4% lead for the Atom x5-E3930.

Feature	Atom x5-E3930	Celeron M 723
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz+50%	1.2 GHz
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)+100%	1 MB
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,185	1,180
Geekbench 6 Single	—	100
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	100

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x5-E3930 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron M 723 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1866 on the Atom x5-E3930 versus DDR2-800 on the Celeron M 723 — the Atom x5-E3930 supports 133.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom x5-E3930) vs 0 (Celeron M 723) — the Atom x5-E3930 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1296 (Atom x5-E3930) and GS45 (Celeron M 723).

Feature	Atom x5-E3930	Celeron M 723
Socket	FCBGA1296	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1866+133%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	4	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom x5-E3930) / None (Celeron M 723). The Atom x5-E3930 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 500), while the Celeron M 723 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron M 723 targets Legacy Embedded. Direct competitor: Celeron M 723 rivals Core Solo U2100.