Atom Z3770 vs Celeron N2806

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom Z3770 vs Celeron N2806 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom Z3770 vs Celeron N2806: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom Z3770

2013

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Celeron N2806 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,189 vs 1,195).
❌100% higher power demand at 8W vs 4W.

Celeron N2806

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 4W instead of 8W, a 4W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Atom Z3770 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2806 better than Atom Z3770?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom Z3770 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2806 pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2806 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2806 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N2806 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2806 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Atom Z3770 vs Celeron N2806 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom Z3770

The Atom Z3770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.46 GHz, with boost up to 2.39 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,189 points. Launch price was $37.

Celeron N2806

The Celeron N2806 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,195 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom Z3770 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron N2806 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Atom Z3770 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.39 GHz on the Atom Z3770 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron N2806 — a 17.8% clock advantage for the Atom Z3770 (base: 1.46 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Atom Z3770 uses the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron N2806 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z3770 scores 1,189 against the Celeron N2806's 1,195 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron N2806. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom Z3770	Celeron N2806
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.39 GHz+20%	2 GHz
Base Clock	1.46 GHz	1.6 GHz+10%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512K (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,189	1,195

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z3770 uses the UTFCBGA1380 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N2806 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Atom Z3770	Celeron N2806
Socket	UTFCBGA1380	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—