A4-3310MX vs Atom Z3770

A4-3310MX vs Atom Z3770 Performance Spectrum

A4-3310MX

2 / 2

1,190

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Atom Z3770

4 / 4

1,189

0.0%

Atom E3827

Celeron B820

Celeron P4505

Celeron Dual-Core T1700

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-3310MX vs Atom Z3770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-3310MX vs Atom Z3770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-3310MX

2011

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌337.5% higher power demand at 35W vs 8W.

Atom Z3770

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 8W instead of 35W, a 27W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,189 vs 1,190).

Quick Answers

So, is A4-3310MX better than Atom Z3770?

Yes. A4-3310MX is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A4-3310MX is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A4-3310MX is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-3310MX still makes the most sense overall. A4-3310MX comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom Z3770 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-3310MX vs Atom Z3770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-3310MX

The A4-3310MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,190 points. Launch price was $50.

Atom Z3770

The Atom Z3770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.46 GHz, with boost up to 2.39 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,189 points. Launch price was $37.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-3310MX packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Atom Z3770 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom Z3770 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A4-3310MX versus 2.39 GHz on the Atom Z3770 — a 4.5% clock advantage for the A4-3310MX (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.46 GHz). The A4-3310MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Atom Z3770 uses Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A4-3310MX scores 1,190 against the Atom Z3770's 1,189 — a 0.1% lead for the A4-3310MX. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A4-3310MX	Atom Z3770
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+5%	2.39 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+44%	1.46 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,190	1,189
Geekbench 6 Single	273	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-3310MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Atom Z3770 uses UTFCBGA1380 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A4-3310MX versus LPDDR3-1066 on the Atom Z3770 — the A4-3310MX supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A4-3310MX supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A4-3310MX) vs 0 (Atom Z3770) — the A4-3310MX offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A4-3310MX	Atom Z3770
Socket	FS1	UTFCBGA1380
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+25%	LPDDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+300%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-3310MX) / not specified (Atom Z3770). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 6480G (A4-3310MX) and Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Atom Z3770) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-3310MX targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-3310MX rivals Pentium B960.