A4-3310MX vs Pentium E6600

A4-3310MX vs Pentium E6600 Performance Spectrum

A4-3310MX

2 / 2

1,190

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium E6600

2 / 2

1,194

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-3310MX vs Pentium E6600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-3310MX vs Pentium E6600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-3310MX

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6480G, while Pentium E6600 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,190 vs 1,194).

Pentium E6600

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $84 MSRP, while A4-3310MX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-3310MX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A4-3310MX better than Pentium E6600?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A4-3310MX is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium E6600 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium E6600 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A4-3310MX is still the much better call for a fresh build. A4-3310MX comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $84 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium E6600 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (14.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-3310MX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-3310MX vs Pentium E6600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-3310MX

The A4-3310MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,190 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium E6600

The Pentium E6600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,194 points. Launch price was $16.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A4-3310MX and Pentium E6600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A4-3310MX versus 0.07 GHz on the Pentium E6600 — a 189.1% clock advantage for the A4-3310MX (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The A4-3310MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium E6600 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A4-3310MX scores 1,190 against the Pentium E6600's 1,194 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium E6600. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A4-3310MX	Pentium E6600
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+3471%	0.07 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	3.06 GHz+46%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (total)+100%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,190	1,194
Geekbench 6 Single	273	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-3310MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium E6600 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4-3310MX	Pentium E6600
Socket	FS1	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-3310MX) / not specified (Pentium E6600). The A4-3310MX includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6480G), while the Pentium E6600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-3310MX targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-3310MX rivals Pentium B960.