A4-3310MX
VS
Pentium E6600

A4-3310MX vs Pentium E6600

AMD

A4-3310MX

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Pentium E6600

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 0.07 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A4-3310MX is positioned at rank 887 and the Pentium E6600 is on rank 912, so the A4-3310MX offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A4-3310MX

#875
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1480%
#876
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1458%
#877
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1338%
#878
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1332%
#879
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1320%
#881
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1275%
#882
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1222%
#883
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1220%
#884
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1188%
#887
A4-3310MX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#889
Core i7-7820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
100%
#890
Celeron 7305
MSRP: $128|Avg: $107
99%
#891
E-300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
99%
#892
Core i7-7820HK
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#895
Pentium B940
MSRP: $134|Avg: $11
98%
#896
Core i5-8305G
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
98%
#897
Celeron 6305
MSRP: $107|Avg: $80
98%
#900
Core i7-8705G
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
96%
#902
Pentium Dual Core T2410
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium E6600

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
21936%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
20728%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
15050%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4534%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3591%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3142%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1799%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1776%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1617%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1617%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1599%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1556%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1534%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1528%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1514%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
99%
#912
Pentium E6600
MSRP: $84|Avg: $50
100%
#913
Pentium G3460
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
100%
#914
Pentium E5500
MSRP: $75|Avg: $25
100%
#915
Pentium E6700
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
100%
#916
Phenom II X4 820
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
99%
#917
Core i7-3930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $150
99%
#919
Sempron LE-1250
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
99%
#920
Core i7-4930K
MSRP: $670|Avg: $100
99%
#921
Pentium E6500
MSRP: $84|Avg: $10
98%
#922
Core i5-2500
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
98%
#923
Athlon II X4 605e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $25
97%
#925
Athlon II X4 610e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $20
96%
#926
Core i5-2390T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $182
96%
#927
Phenom II X4 910e
MSRP: $157|Avg: $69
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A4-3310MX leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium E6600 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA4-3310MXPentium E6600
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA4-3310MXPentium E6600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A4-3310MX and Pentium E6600

AMD

A4-3310MX

The A4-3310MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,190 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Pentium E6600

The Pentium E6600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 17 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.06 GHz, with boost up to 0.07 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,194 points. Launch price was $16.

Processing Power

Both the A4-3310MX and Pentium E6600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A4-3310MX versus 0.07 GHz on the Pentium E6600 — a 189.1% clock advantage for the A4-3310MX (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.06 GHz). The A4-3310MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium E6600 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A4-3310MX scores 1,190 against the Pentium E6600's 1,194 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium E6600. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureA4-3310MXPentium E6600
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz+3471%
0.07 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
3.06 GHz+46%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (total)+100%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Llano (2011−2012)
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,190
1,194
Geekbench 6 Single
273
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-3310MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium E6600 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA4-3310MXPentium E6600
Socket
FS1
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-3310MX) / not specified (Pentium E6600). The A4-3310MX includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6480G), while the Pentium E6600 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-3310MX targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-3310MX rivals Pentium B960.

FeatureA4-3310MXPentium E6600
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6480G
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Laptop