A4-3310MX vs Core i7-680UM

A4-3310MX vs Core i7-680UM Performance Spectrum

A4-3310MX

2 / 2

1,190

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-680UM

2 / 4

1,196

+0.5%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-3310MX vs Core i7-680UM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-3310MX vs Core i7-680UM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-3310MX

2011

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6480G, while Core i7-680UM needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,190 vs 1,196).
❌94.4% higher power demand at 35W vs 18W.

Core i7-680UM

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 18W instead of 35W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while A4-3310MX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-680UM better than A4-3310MX?

Yes. Core i7-680UM is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 41 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-680UM is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.7% more average FPS across 41 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-680UM is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-680UM still makes the most sense overall. Core i7-680UM comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 41 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-3310MX makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-3310MX vs Core i7-680UM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-3310MX

The A4-3310MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,190 points. Launch price was $50.

Core i7-680UM

The Core i7-680UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.46 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800. Passmark benchmark score: 1,196 points. Launch price was $317.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-3310MX packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i7-680UM's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A4-3310MX versus 2.53 GHz on the Core i7-680UM — a 1.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-680UM (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.46 GHz). The A4-3310MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-680UM uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-3310MX scores 1,190 against the Core i7-680UM's 1,196 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i7-680UM. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-3310MX vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-680UM.

Feature	A4-3310MX	Core i7-680UM
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	2.53 GHz+1%
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+44%	1.46 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,190	1,196
Geekbench 6 Single	273	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-3310MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-680UM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4-3310MX	Core i7-680UM
Socket	FS1	BGA1288
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-3310MX) / not specified (Core i7-680UM). The A4-3310MX includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6480G), while the Core i7-680UM requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-3310MX targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-3310MX rivals Pentium B960.