A4-3310MX vs Celeron 3965Y

A4-3310MX vs Celeron 3965Y Performance Spectrum

A4-3310MX

2 / 2

1,190

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron 3965Y

2 / 2

1,201

+0.9%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-3310MX vs Celeron 3965Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-3310MX vs Celeron 3965Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-3310MX

2011

Why buy it

✅60% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (273 vs 372).
❌Lower PassMark (1,190 vs 1,201).
❌483.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 6W.

Celeron 3965Y

2017

Why buy it

✅+36.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 6W instead of 35W, a 29W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 3965Y better than A4-3310MX?

Yes. Celeron 3965Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 3965Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 3965Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 3965Y still makes the most sense overall. Celeron 3965Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 3965Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4-3310MX vs Celeron 3965Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-3310MX

The A4-3310MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,190 points. Launch price was $50.

Celeron 3965Y

The Celeron 3965Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,201 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A4-3310MX and Celeron 3965Y share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A4-3310MX versus 1.3 GHz on the Celeron 3965Y — a 63.2% clock advantage for the A4-3310MX (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The A4-3310MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron 3965Y uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A4-3310MX scores 1,190 against the Celeron 3965Y's 1,201 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron 3965Y. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 273 vs 372, a 30.7% lead for the Celeron 3965Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-3310MX vs 2 MB on the Celeron 3965Y.

Feature	A4-3310MX	Celeron 3965Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+92%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+40%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	1,190	1,201
Geekbench 6 Single	273	372+36%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	708

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-3310MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 3965Y uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A4-3310MX versus LPDDR3-1866 on the Celeron 3965Y — the Celeron 3965Y supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A4-3310MX) vs 10 (Celeron 3965Y) — the A4-3310MX offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A4-3310MX	Celeron 3965Y
Socket	FS1	FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	LPDDR3-1866+40%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+60%	10

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-3310MX) vs VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 3965Y). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 6480G (A4-3310MX) and Intel HD Graphics 615 (Celeron 3965Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-3310MX targets Budget Laptop, Celeron 3965Y targets Low Power. Direct competitor: A4-3310MX rivals Pentium B960; Celeron 3965Y rivals Pentium Gold 4415Y.

Feature	A4-3310MX	Celeron 3965Y
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 6480G	Intel HD Graphics 615
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Budget Laptop	Low Power