A4-3310MX vs Celeron N2806

A4-3310MX vs Celeron N2806 Performance Spectrum

A4-3310MX

2 / 2

1,190

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron N2806

2 / 2

1,195

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-3310MX vs Celeron N2806 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-3310MX vs Celeron N2806: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-3310MX

2011

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6480G, while Celeron N2806 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,190 vs 1,195).
❌775% higher power demand at 35W vs 4W.

Celeron N2806

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 4W instead of 35W, a 31W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while A4-3310MX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2806 better than A4-3310MX?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A4-3310MX is ahead with 25% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2806 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2806 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2806 still makes the most sense overall. Celeron N2806 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2806 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A4-3310MX vs Celeron N2806 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-3310MX

The A4-3310MX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,190 points. Launch price was $50.

Celeron N2806

The Celeron N2806 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,195 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A4-3310MX and Celeron N2806 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A4-3310MX versus 2 GHz on the Celeron N2806 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the A4-3310MX (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The A4-3310MX uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron N2806 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A4-3310MX scores 1,190 against the Celeron N2806's 1,195 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron N2806. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A4-3310MX	Celeron N2806
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+25%	2 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+31%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,190	1,195
Geekbench 6 Single	273	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-3310MX uses the FS1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron N2806 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4-3310MX	Celeron N2806
Socket	FS1	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-3310MX) / not specified (Celeron N2806). The A4-3310MX includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6480G), while the Celeron N2806 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-3310MX targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A4-3310MX rivals Pentium B960.