
Celeron M 723

Core i5-430UM
Celeron M 723 vs Core i5-430UM Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron M 723 vs Core i5-430UM FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron M 723 vs Core i5-430UM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron M 723
2008Why buy it
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 18W, a 17W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (100 vs 250).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (100 vs 500).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $161 MSRP, while Core i5-430UM mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-430UM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-430UM
2010Why buy it
- ✅+150% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Celeron M 723 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌1700% higher power demand at 18W vs 1W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-430UM better than Celeron M 723?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron M 723 vs Core i5-430UM Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M 723
The Celeron M 723 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,180 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i5-430UM
The Core i5-430UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.73 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron M 723 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core i5-430UM offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-430UM has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Celeron M 723 versus 1.73 GHz on the Core i5-430UM — a 36.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-430UM. The Celeron M 723 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-430UM uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 723 scores 1,180 against the Core i5-430UM's 1,185 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-430UM. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 100 vs 250, a 85.7% lead for the Core i5-430UM that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 100 vs 500 (133.3% advantage for the Core i5-430UM).
| Feature | Celeron M 723 | Core i5-430UM |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 2 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 1.2 GHz | 1.73 GHz+44% |
| Base Clock | — | 1.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Penryn (2008−2011) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,180 | 1,185 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 100 | 250+150% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 100 | 500+400% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron M 723 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-430UM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-800 memory speed. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron M 723) vs 16 (Core i5-430UM) — the Core i5-430UM offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GS45 (Celeron M 723) and HM55 (Core i5-430UM).
| Feature | Celeron M 723 | Core i5-430UM |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA956 | BGA1288 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR3-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: None (Celeron M 723) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-430UM). The Core i5-430UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Celeron M 723 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron M 723 targets Legacy Embedded, Core i5-430UM targets Legacy Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Celeron M 723 rivals Core Solo U2100; Core i5-430UM rivals Pentium SU7300.
| Feature | Celeron M 723 | Core i5-430UM |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel HD Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | None | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Legacy Embedded | Legacy Ultrabook |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













