Celeron M 723 vs Core i5-430UM

Intel

Celeron M 723

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2008
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-430UM

2 Cores4 Thrd18 WWMax: 1.73 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······

Celeron M 723 vs Core i5-430UM Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M 723 vs Core i5-430UM FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M 723 vs Core i5-430UM: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M 723

2008

Why buy it

  • Draws 1W instead of 18W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (100 vs 250).
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (100 vs 500).
  • Launch MSRP is still $161 MSRP, while Core i5-430UM mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-430UM can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-430UM

2010

Why buy it

  • +150% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Celeron M 723 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • 1700% higher power demand at 18W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-430UM better than Celeron M 723?
Yes. Core i5-430UM is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 400% better Geekbench multi-core, 0.4% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i5-430UM is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-430UM is the stronger fit. You are getting 400% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-430UM is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i5-430UM comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $161 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron M 723 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-430UM makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron M 723 vs Core i5-430UM Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron M 723

The Celeron M 723 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,180 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-430UM

The Core i5-430UM is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.73 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Celeron M 723 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core i5-430UM offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-430UM has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Celeron M 723 versus 1.73 GHz on the Core i5-430UM — a 36.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-430UM. The Celeron M 723 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i5-430UM uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 723 scores 1,180 against the Core i5-430UM's 1,185 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-430UM. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 100 vs 250, a 85.7% lead for the Core i5-430UM that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 100 vs 500 (133.3% advantage for the Core i5-430UM).

FeatureCeleron M 723Core i5-430UM
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
2 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
1.2 GHz
1.73 GHz+44%
Base Clock
1.2 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512 kB
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,180
1,185
Geekbench 6 Single
100
250+150%
Geekbench 6 Multi
100
500+400%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 723 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-430UM uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-800 memory speed. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron M 723) vs 16 (Core i5-430UM) — the Core i5-430UM offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GS45 (Celeron M 723) and HM55 (Core i5-430UM).

FeatureCeleron M 723Core i5-430UM
Socket
BGA956
BGA1288
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: None (Celeron M 723) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-430UM). The Core i5-430UM includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Celeron M 723 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron M 723 targets Legacy Embedded, Core i5-430UM targets Legacy Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Celeron M 723 rivals Core Solo U2100; Core i5-430UM rivals Pentium SU7300.

FeatureCeleron M 723Core i5-430UM
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
None
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Legacy Embedded
Legacy Ultrabook