Celeron M 723 vs Pentium T4400

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M 723 vs Pentium T4400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M 723 vs Pentium T4400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M 723

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (100 vs 249).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 11.0 PassMark/$ ($161 MSRP vs $107 MSRP).

Pentium T4400

2009

Why buy it

✅+149% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $54 less on MSRP ($107 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
✅Delivers 49.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 11.0 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($107 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,175 vs 1,180).
❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium T4400 better than Celeron M 723?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium T4400 is ahead with a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 723 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 723 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium T4400 is the better buy right now. Pentium T4400 comes in $54 cheaper on MSRP at $107 MSRP versus $161 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron M 723 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. It is also 49.8% better value on MSRP (11.0 vs 7.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium T4400 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron M 723 vs Pentium T4400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M 723

The Celeron M 723 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,180 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium T4400

The Pentium T4400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,175 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron M 723 is built on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron M 723 scores 1,180 against the Pentium T4400's 1,175 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron M 723. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 100 vs 249, a 85.4% lead for the Pentium T4400 that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	Celeron M 723	Pentium T4400
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	—
Boost Clock	1.2 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	1 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	1 MB	—
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	—
PassMark	1,180	1,175
Geekbench 6 Single	100	249+149%
Geekbench 6 Multi	100	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 723 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium T4400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-800 memory speed. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: GS45 (Celeron M 723) and GL40,GM45 (Pentium T4400).

Feature	Celeron M 723	Pentium T4400
Socket	BGA956	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support None virtualization. Primary use case: Celeron M 723 targets Legacy Embedded, Pentium T4400 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron M 723 rivals Core Solo U2100; Pentium T4400 rivals AMD A4-3300M.

Feature	Celeron M 723	Pentium T4400
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	None	None
Target Use	Legacy Embedded	Budget

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron M 723 was priced at $161, while the Pentium T4400 came in at $107. On launch pricing ($161 vs $107), Pentium T4400 was $54 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron M 723 delivers 7.3 pts/$ vs 11.0 pts/$ for the Pentium T4400 — making the Pentium T4400 the 39.9% better value option.

Feature	Celeron M 723	Pentium T4400
MSRP	$161	$107-34%
Performance per Dollar	7.3	11.0+51%
Release Date	2008	2009

Search Celeron M 723 on Amazon

Search Pentium T4400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.