Celeron M 723 vs Xeon 5130

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M 723 vs Xeon 5130 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M 723 vs Xeon 5130: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M 723

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $155 less on MSRP ($161 MSRP vs $316 MSRP).
✅Delivers 97.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 7.3 vs 3.7 PassMark/$ ($161 MSRP vs $316 MSRP).
✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 5130, which brings 2 cores / 2 threads.

Xeon 5130

2006

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 2 cores / 2 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,175 vs 1,180).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.7 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($316 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron M 723 better than Xeon 5130?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 5130 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Celeron M 723 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 723 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron M 723 is the better buy right now. Celeron M 723 comes in $155 cheaper on MSRP at $161 MSRP versus $316 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon 5130 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 97.1% better value on MSRP (7.3 vs 3.7 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron M 723 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron M 723 vs Xeon 5130 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M 723

The Celeron M 723 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,180 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon 5130

The Xeon 5130 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Woodcrest (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,175 points. Launch price was $16.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron M 723 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Xeon 5130 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Xeon 5130 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Celeron M 723 versus 2 GHz on the Xeon 5130 — a 50% clock advantage for the Xeon 5130. The Celeron M 723 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon 5130 uses Woodcrest (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 723 scores 1,180 against the Xeon 5130's 1,175 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron M 723.

Feature	Celeron M 723	Xeon 5130
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.2 GHz	2 GHz+67%
Base Clock	—	2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	4 MB+300%
Process	45 nm-31%	65 nm
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Woodcrest (2006)
PassMark	1,180	1,175
Geekbench 6 Single	100	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	100	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 723 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Xeon 5130 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron M 723	Xeon 5130
Socket	BGA956	LGA771
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: None (Celeron M 723) / not specified (Xeon 5130). Primary use case: Celeron M 723 targets Legacy Embedded. Direct competitor: Celeron M 723 rivals Core Solo U2100.

Feature	Celeron M 723	Xeon 5130
Integrated GPU	No	—
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	None	—
Target Use	Legacy Embedded	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron M 723 was priced at $161, while the Xeon 5130 came in at $316. On launch pricing ($161 vs $316), Celeron M 723 was $155 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron M 723 delivers 7.3 pts/$ vs 3.7 pts/$ for the Xeon 5130 — making the Celeron M 723 the 65.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron M 723	Xeon 5130
MSRP	$161-49%	$316
Performance per Dollar	7.3+97%	3.7
Release Date	2008	2006

Search Celeron M 723 on Amazon

Search Xeon 5130 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.