Celeron M 723 vs E-300

Celeron M 723 vs E-300 Performance Spectrum

Celeron M 723

1 / 1

1,180

+0.3%

1,176

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M 723 vs E-300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M 723 vs E-300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M 723

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 18W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 19.6 PassMark/$ ($161 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while E-300 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

E-300

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
✅Delivers 167.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.6 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6310, while Celeron M 723 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron M 723 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,176 vs 1,180).
❌1700% higher power demand at 18W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron M 723 better than E-300?

Yes. Celeron M 723 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron M 723 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron M 723 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron M 723 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Celeron M 723 comes in 168.3% more expensive on MSRP at $161 MSRP versus $60 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. E-300 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 3.0% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E-300 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron M 723 vs E-300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M 723

The Celeron M 723 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,180 points. Launch price was $69.

E-300

The E-300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 22 August 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,176 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron M 723 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the E-300 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the E-300 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Celeron M 723 versus 1.3 GHz on the E-300 — a 8% clock advantage for the E-300. The Celeron M 723 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the E-300 uses Zacate (2011−2013) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 723 scores 1,180 against the E-300's 1,176 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron M 723.

Feature	Celeron M 723	E-300
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.2 GHz	1.3 GHz+8%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	45 nm	40 nm-11%
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Zacate (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,180	1,176
Geekbench 6 Single	100	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	100	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 723 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the E-300 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Celeron M 723 versus DDR3-1066 on the E-300 — the E-300 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Celeron M 723) vs 1 (E-300). Both provide 0 PCIe lanes.

Feature	Celeron M 723	E-300
Socket	BGA956	FT1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	DDR3-1066+33%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	2+100%	1
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: None (Celeron M 723) vs AMD-V (E-300). The E-300 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6310), while the Celeron M 723 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron M 723 targets Legacy Embedded, E-300 targets Budget Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron M 723 rivals Core Solo U2100.

Feature	Celeron M 723	E-300
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	None	Radeon HD 6310
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	None	AMD-V
Target Use	Legacy Embedded	Budget Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron M 723 was priced at $161, while the E-300 came in at $60. On launch pricing ($161 vs $60), E-300 was $101 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron M 723 delivers 7.3 pts/$ vs 19.6 pts/$ for the E-300 — making the E-300 the 91.1% better value option.

Feature	Celeron M 723	E-300
MSRP	$161	$60-63%
Performance per Dollar	7.3	19.6+168%
Release Date	2008	2011

Search Celeron M 723 on Amazon

Search E-300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.