Celeron M 723
VS
Celeron G465

Celeron M 723 vs Celeron G465

Intel

Celeron M 723

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Celeron G465

1 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron M 723 is positioned at rank 1153 and the Celeron G465 is on rank 867, so the Celeron G465 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 723

#1141
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4003%
#1142
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3944%
#1143
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3621%
#1144
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3604%
#1145
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3571%
#1147
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3449%
#1148
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3307%
#1149
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3302%
#1150
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3213%
#1153
Celeron M 723
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
100%
#1154
Core i7-3517UE
MSRP: $330|Avg: $35
98%
#1155
Core M-5Y51
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1156
Pentium N3530
MSRP: $161|Avg: $20
98%
#1157
Core i3-330E
MSRP: $177|Avg: $89
97%
#1159
Core i7-2640M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
96%
#1161
Core M-5Y71
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1162
Core i7-2620M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
96%
#1164
Celeron N3010
MSRP: $107|Avg: N/A
94%
#1165
Core i7-3537U
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
93%
#1166
Core M-5Y10a
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
92%
#1167
Core M-5Y31
MSRP: $281|Avg: $30
92%
#1168
Core M-5Y10c
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G465

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
18412%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
17398%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12632%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3805%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3014%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2637%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1510%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1491%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1357%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1357%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1342%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1306%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1287%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1282%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1271%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
97%
#867
Celeron G465
MSRP: $70|Avg: $37
100%
#868
Athlon II X4 630
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
100%
#869
A6-7400K
MSRP: $101|Avg: $43
98%
#870
Core i7-4765T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
98%
#871
Core i7-4770TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $303
98%
#872
Core i5-4570T
MSRP: $195|Avg: $45
98%
#873
Athlon II X2 260u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
97%
#875
A4-3420
MSRP: $65|Avg: $30
97%
#876
Core i5-5675R
MSRP: $339|Avg: $392
97%
#877
Pentium G3470
MSRP: $150|Avg: $130
96%
#878
Core i5-3335S
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
96%
#879
Core i5-3470T
MSRP: $184|Avg: $35
96%
#881
Pentium G6960
MSRP: $89|Avg: $15
95%
#882
Core i5-2500T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Celeron G465 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron M 723 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron M 723Celeron G465
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($161)
More affordable ($37)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron G465 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 77% cheaper ($37 vs $161) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCeleron M 723Celeron G465
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+337%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($161)
More affordable ($37)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron M 723 and Celeron G465

Intel

Celeron M 723

The Celeron M 723 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,180 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron G465

The Celeron G465 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $80.

Processing Power

The Celeron M 723 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Celeron G465's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Celeron M 723 versus 1.9 GHz on the Celeron G465 — a 45.2% clock advantage for the Celeron G465. The Celeron M 723 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G465 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 723 scores 1,180 against the Celeron G465's 1,185 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G465. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 100 vs 300, a 100% lead for the Celeron G465 that directly translates to higher frame rates.

FeatureCeleron M 723Celeron G465
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 2
Boost Clock
1.2 GHz
1.9 GHz+58%
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
L3 Cache
1.5 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256 kB
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Penryn (2008−2011)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,180
1,185
Geekbench 6 Single
100
300+200%
Geekbench 6 Multi
100
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 723 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron G465 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Celeron M 723 versus DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G465 — the Celeron G465 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G465 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron M 723) vs 16 (Celeron G465) — the Celeron G465 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GS45 (Celeron M 723) and H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G465).

FeatureCeleron M 723Celeron G465
Socket
BGA956
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
DDR3-1066+50%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
32 GB+300%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: None (Celeron M 723) vs VT-x (Celeron G465). The Celeron G465 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Celeron M 723 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron M 723 targets Legacy Embedded, Celeron G465 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron M 723 rivals Core Solo U2100; Celeron G465 rivals Pentium G630.

FeatureCeleron M 723Celeron G465
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
None
VT-x
Target Use
Legacy Embedded
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron M 723 launched at $161 MSRP, while the Celeron G465 debuted at $70. At current prices ($161 vs $37), the Celeron G465 is $124 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron M 723 delivers 7.3 pts/$ vs 32.0 pts/$ for the Celeron G465 — making the Celeron G465 the 125.5% better value option.

FeatureCeleron M 723Celeron G465
MSRP
$161
$70-57%
Avg Price (30d)
$161
$37-77%
Performance per Dollar
7.3
32.0+338%
Release Date
2008
2012