Celeron G465 vs Celeron M 723

CPU

GPU

Celeron G465

1 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2012

Buy on Amazon

Celeron M 723

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2008

Buy on Amazon

Celeron G465 vs Celeron M 723 Performance Spectrum

Celeron G465

1 / 1

1,185

+0.4%

1,180

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G465 vs Celeron M 723 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G465 vs Celeron M 723: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G465

2012

Why buy it

✅+200% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Costs $91 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
✅Delivers 131.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.9 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($70 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Celeron M 723 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Celeron M 723

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (100 vs 300).
❌Lower PassMark (1,180 vs 1,185).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($161 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G465 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G465 better than Celeron M 723?

Yes. Celeron G465 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G465 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G465 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G465 is the better buy right now. Celeron G465 comes in $91 cheaper on MSRP at $70 MSRP versus $161 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 131.0% better value on MSRP (16.9 vs 7.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G465 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G465 vs Celeron M 723 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G465

The Celeron G465 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $80.

Celeron M 723

The Celeron M 723 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,180 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G465 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Celeron M 723's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron G465 versus 1.2 GHz on the Celeron M 723 — a 45.2% clock advantage for the Celeron G465. The Celeron G465 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron M 723 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G465 scores 1,185 against the Celeron M 723's 1,180 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G465. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 300 vs 100, a 100% lead for the Celeron G465 that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	Celeron G465	Celeron M 723
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz+58%	1.2 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	—
L3 Cache	1.5 MB	—
L2 Cache	256 kB	1 MB+300%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,185	1,180
Geekbench 6 Single	300+200%	100
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	100

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G465 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron M 723 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G465 versus DDR2-800 on the Celeron M 723 — the Celeron G465 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G465 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G465) vs 0 (Celeron M 723) — the Celeron G465 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G465) and GS45 (Celeron M 723).

Feature	Celeron G465	Celeron M 723
Socket	LGA1155	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066+33%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+300%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G465) vs None (Celeron M 723). The Celeron G465 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Celeron M 723 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G465 targets Budget, Celeron M 723 targets Legacy Embedded. Direct competitor: Celeron G465 rivals Pentium G630; Celeron M 723 rivals Core Solo U2100.

Feature	Celeron G465	Celeron M 723
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	None
Target Use	Budget	Legacy Embedded

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G465 was priced at $70, while the Celeron M 723 came in at $161. On launch pricing ($70 vs $161), Celeron G465 was $91 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G465 delivers 16.9 pts/$ vs 7.3 pts/$ for the Celeron M 723 — making the Celeron G465 the 79.1% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G465	Celeron M 723
MSRP	$70-57%	$161
Performance per Dollar	16.9+132%	7.3
Release Date	2012	2008

Search Celeron G465 on Amazon

Search Celeron M 723 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.