Celeron G465 vs Celeron M 723
Celeron G465
Celeron M 723
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G465 is positioned at rank 867 and the Celeron M 723 is on rank 1153, so the Celeron G465 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G465
Performance Per Dollar Celeron M 723
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron G465 | Celeron M 723 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($37) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($161) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron G465 | Celeron M 723 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+337%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($37) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($161) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G465 and Celeron M 723
Celeron G465
The Celeron G465 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $80.
Celeron M 723
The Celeron M 723 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,180 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron G465 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, matching the Celeron M 723's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron G465 versus 1.2 GHz on the Celeron M 723 — a 45.2% clock advantage for the Celeron G465. The Celeron G465 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron M 723 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G465 scores 1,185 against the Celeron M 723's 1,180 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G465. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 300 vs 100, a 100% lead for the Celeron G465 that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | Celeron G465 | Celeron M 723 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 2 | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1.9 GHz+58% | 1.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.9 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 1.5 MB | — |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB | 1 MB+300% |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,185 | 1,180 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 300+200% | 100 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 100 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron G465 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron M 723 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G465 versus DDR2-800 on the Celeron M 723 — the Celeron G465 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G465 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G465) vs 0 (Celeron M 723) — the Celeron G465 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G465) and GS45 (Celeron M 723).
| Feature | Celeron G465 | Celeron M 723 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | BGA956 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066+50% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G465) vs None (Celeron M 723). The Celeron G465 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Celeron M 723 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G465 targets Budget, Celeron M 723 targets Legacy Embedded. Direct competitor: Celeron G465 rivals Pentium G630; Celeron M 723 rivals Core Solo U2100.
| Feature | Celeron G465 | Celeron M 723 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | None |
| Target Use | Budget | Legacy Embedded |
Value Analysis
The Celeron G465 launched at $70 MSRP, while the Celeron M 723 debuted at $161. At current prices ($37 vs $161), the Celeron G465 is $124 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G465 delivers 32.0 pts/$ vs 7.3 pts/$ for the Celeron M 723 — making the Celeron G465 the 125.5% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G465 | Celeron M 723 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70-57% | $161 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $37-77% | $161 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.0+338% | 7.3 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron G465 and Celeron M 723
