Celeron G465 vs Pentium E5800

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G465 vs Pentium E5800 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G465 vs Pentium E5800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G465

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium E5800 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,185 vs 1,190).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 18.6 PassMark/$ ($70 MSRP vs $64 MSRP).

Pentium E5800

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $6 less on MSRP ($64 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
✅Delivers 9.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 18.6 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($64 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G465 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium E5800 better than Celeron G465?

Yes. Pentium E5800 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium E5800 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium E5800 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium E5800 is the better buy right now. Pentium E5800 comes in $6 cheaper on MSRP at $64 MSRP versus $70 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 9.8% better value on MSRP (18.6 vs 16.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G465 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron G465 vs Pentium E5800 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G465

The Celeron G465 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $80.

Pentium E5800

The Pentium E5800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 November 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,190 points. Launch price was $68.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G465 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium E5800 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium E5800 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron G465 versus 3.2 GHz on the Pentium E5800 — a 51% clock advantage for the Pentium E5800 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Celeron G465 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium E5800 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G465 scores 1,185 against the Pentium E5800's 1,190 — a 0.4% lead for the Pentium E5800. L3 cache: 1.5 MB on the Celeron G465 vs 0 kB on the Pentium E5800.

Feature	Celeron G465	Pentium E5800
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz	3.2 GHz+68%
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	3.2 GHz+68%
L3 Cache	1.5 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB	2 MB (total)+700%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,185	1,190
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G465 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium E5800 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G465	Pentium E5800
Socket	LGA1155	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G465) / not specified (Pentium E5800). The Celeron G465 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium E5800 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G465 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G465 rivals Pentium G630.

Feature	Celeron G465	Pentium E5800
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G465 was priced at $70, while the Pentium E5800 came in at $64. On launch pricing ($70 vs $64), Pentium E5800 was $6 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G465 delivers 16.9 pts/$ vs 18.6 pts/$ for the Pentium E5800 — making the Pentium E5800 the 9.4% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G465	Pentium E5800
MSRP	$70	$64-9%
Performance per Dollar	16.9	18.6+10%
Release Date	2012	2010

Search Celeron G465 on Amazon

Search Pentium E5800 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.