Celeron G465 vs Pentium A1018

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G465 vs Pentium A1018 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G465 vs Pentium A1018: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G465

2012

Why buy it

✅+50% larger total L3 cache (1.5 MB vs 1 MB).
✅Costs $62 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $132 MSRP).
✅Delivers 88.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.9 vs 9.0 PassMark/$ ($70 MSRP vs $132 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium A1018 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,185 vs 1,188).

Pentium A1018

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 1.5 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.0 vs 16.9 PassMark/$ ($132 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G465 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium A1018 better than Celeron G465?

Yes. Pentium A1018 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium A1018 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium A1018 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium A1018 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium A1018 comes in 88.6% more expensive on MSRP at $132 MSRP versus $70 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G465 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 88.1% better value on paper (16.9 vs 9.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium A1018 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G465 vs Pentium A1018 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G465

The Celeron G465 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $80.

Pentium A1018

The Pentium A1018 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,188 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G465 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium A1018 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium A1018 has 1 more core. The Celeron G465 is built on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G465 scores 1,185 against the Pentium A1018's 1,188 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium A1018. L3 cache: 1.5 MB on the Celeron G465 vs 1 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Pentium A1018.

Feature	Celeron G465	Pentium A1018
Cores / Threads	1 / 2	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz	—
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	2.1 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	256 kB	—
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	—
PassMark	1,185	1,188
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G465 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium A1018 uses PGA988 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G465	Pentium A1018
Socket	LGA1155	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G465) / not specified (Pentium A1018). The Celeron G465 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium A1018 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G465 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G465 rivals Pentium G630.

Feature	Celeron G465	Pentium A1018
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G465 was priced at $70, while the Pentium A1018 came in at $132. On launch pricing ($70 vs $132), Celeron G465 was $62 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G465 delivers 16.9 pts/$ vs 9.0 pts/$ for the Pentium A1018 — making the Celeron G465 the 61.2% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G465	Pentium A1018
MSRP	$70-47%	$132
Performance per Dollar	16.9+88%	9.0
Release Date	2012	2013

Search Celeron G465 on Amazon

Search Pentium A1018 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.