Celeron G465
VS
Core 2 Duo P9700

Celeron G465 vs Core 2 Duo P9700

Intel

Celeron G465

1 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo P9700

2 Cores2 Thrd28 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G465 is positioned at rank 867 and the Core 2 Duo P9700 is on rank 564, so the Core 2 Duo P9700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G465

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
18412%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
17398%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12632%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3805%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3014%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2637%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1510%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1491%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1357%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1357%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1342%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1306%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1287%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1282%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1271%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
97%
#867
Celeron G465
MSRP: $70|Avg: $37
100%
#868
Athlon II X4 630
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
100%
#869
A6-7400K
MSRP: $101|Avg: $43
98%
#870
Core i7-4765T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
98%
#871
Core i7-4770TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $303
98%
#872
Core i5-4570T
MSRP: $195|Avg: $45
98%
#873
Athlon II X2 260u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
97%
#875
A4-3420
MSRP: $65|Avg: $30
97%
#876
Core i5-5675R
MSRP: $339|Avg: $392
97%
#877
Pentium G3470
MSRP: $150|Avg: $130
96%
#878
Core i5-3335S
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
96%
#879
Core i5-3470T
MSRP: $184|Avg: $35
96%
#881
Pentium G6960
MSRP: $89|Avg: $15
95%
#882
Core i5-2500T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo P9700

#176
Core i9-13900HK
MSRP: $697|Avg: N/A
99%
#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
98%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
98%
#552
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
747%
#553
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
736%
#554
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
676%
#555
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
673%
#556
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
667%
#558
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
644%
#559
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
617%
#560
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
616%
#561
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
600%
#564
Core 2 Duo P9700
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#572
A10-9600P
MSRP: $128|Avg: $50
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core 2 Duo P9700 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron G465 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron G465Core 2 Duo P9700
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($37)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron G465Core 2 Duo P9700
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($37)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G465 and Core 2 Duo P9700

Intel

Celeron G465

The Celeron G465 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $80.

Intel

Core 2 Duo P9700

The Core 2 Duo P9700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,178 points. Launch price was $348.

Processing Power

The Celeron G465 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the Core 2 Duo P9700 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core 2 Duo P9700 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron G465 versus 2.8 GHz on the Core 2 Duo P9700 — a 38.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo P9700 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron G465 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo P9700 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G465 scores 1,185 against the Core 2 Duo P9700's 1,178 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G465. L3 cache: 1.5 MB on the Celeron G465 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo P9700.

FeatureCeleron G465Core 2 Duo P9700
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
1.9 GHz
2.8 GHz+47%
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
2.8 GHz+47%
L3 Cache
1.5 MB
6 MB L2 Cache+300%
L2 Cache
256 kB
6 MB (total)+2300%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
1,185
1,178
Geekbench 6 Single
300
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G465 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo P9700 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron G465Core 2 Duo P9700
Socket
LGA1155
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G465) / not specified (Core 2 Duo P9700). The Celeron G465 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Core 2 Duo P9700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G465 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G465 rivals Pentium G630.

FeatureCeleron G465Core 2 Duo P9700
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget