Celeron G465
VS
Core 2 Duo T9800

Celeron G465 vs Core 2 Duo T9800

Intel

Celeron G465

1 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T9800

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.92 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G465 is positioned at rank 867 and the Core 2 Duo T9800 is on rank 345, so the Core 2 Duo T9800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G465

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
18412%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
17398%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12632%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3805%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3014%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2637%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1510%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1491%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1357%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1357%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1342%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1306%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1287%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1282%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1271%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
97%
#867
Celeron G465
MSRP: $70|Avg: $37
100%
#868
Athlon II X4 630
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
100%
#869
A6-7400K
MSRP: $101|Avg: $43
98%
#870
Core i7-4765T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
98%
#871
Core i7-4770TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $303
98%
#872
Core i5-4570T
MSRP: $195|Avg: $45
98%
#873
Athlon II X2 260u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
97%
#875
A4-3420
MSRP: $65|Avg: $30
97%
#876
Core i5-5675R
MSRP: $339|Avg: $392
97%
#877
Pentium G3470
MSRP: $150|Avg: $130
96%
#878
Core i5-3335S
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
96%
#879
Core i5-3470T
MSRP: $184|Avg: $35
96%
#881
Pentium G6960
MSRP: $89|Avg: $15
95%
#882
Core i5-2500T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T9800

#101
Core i5-1350P
MSRP: $320|Avg: $250
99%
#102
Core i3-1220P
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
98%
#333
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
494%
#334
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
486%
#335
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
446%
#336
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
444%
#337
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
440%
#339
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
425%
#340
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
408%
#341
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
407%
#342
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
396%
#345
Core 2 Duo T9800
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core 2 Duo T9800 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron G465 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.3% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCeleron G465Core 2 Duo T9800
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($37)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron G465Core 2 Duo T9800
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($37)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G465 and Core 2 Duo T9800

Intel

Celeron G465

The Celeron G465 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $80.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T9800

The Core 2 Duo T9800 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 2.92 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,189 points. Launch price was $530.

Processing Power

The Celeron G465 packs 1 cores / 2 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T9800 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core 2 Duo T9800 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Celeron G465 versus 2.92 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T9800 — a 42.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo T9800 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The Celeron G465 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T9800 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G465 scores 1,185 against the Core 2 Duo T9800's 1,189 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo T9800. L3 cache: 1.5 MB on the Celeron G465 vs 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T9800.

FeatureCeleron G465Core 2 Duo T9800
Cores / Threads
1 / 2
2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock
1.9 GHz
2.92 GHz+54%
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
2.93 GHz+54%
L3 Cache
1.5 MB
6 MB L2 Cache+300%
L2 Cache
256 kB
6 MB+2300%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark
1,185
1,189
Geekbench 6 Single
300
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G465 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T9800 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron G465Core 2 Duo T9800
Socket
LGA1155
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G465) / not specified (Core 2 Duo T9800). The Celeron G465 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Core 2 Duo T9800 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G465 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G465 rivals Pentium G630.

FeatureCeleron G465Core 2 Duo T9800
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget