Athlon 64 X2 4000+ vs Core i3-370M

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ vs Core i3-370M Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 X2 4000+

2 / 2

1,175

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-370M

2 / 4

1,170

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ vs Core i3-370M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ vs Core i3-370M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 89W instead of 512W, a 423W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Core i3-370M.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (195 vs 315).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (380 vs 700).
❌Launch MSRP is still $328 MSRP, while Core i3-370M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-370M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i3-370M

2010

Why buy it

✅+61.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Athlon 64 X2 4000+ needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌475.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 89W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 64 X2 4000+.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-370M better than Athlon 64 X2 4000+?

Yes. Core i3-370M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 84.2% better Geekbench multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-370M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-370M is the stronger fit. You are getting 84.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-370M is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-370M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $328 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon 64 X2 4000+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2006 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (3.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM2.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-370M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ vs Core i3-370M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+

The Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,175 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i3-370M

The Core i3-370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,170 points. Launch price was $245.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 X2 4000+ packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-370M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ versus 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-370M — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-370M. The Athlon 64 X2 4000+ uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Core i3-370M uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ scores 1,175 against the Core i3-370M's 1,170 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 4000+. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 195 vs 315, a 47.1% lead for the Core i3-370M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 380 vs 700 (59.3% advantage for the Core i3-370M). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-370M.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 4000+	Core i3-370M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.4 GHz+20%
Base Clock	—	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K+100%	256K (per core)
Process	90 nm	32 nm-64%
Architecture	Windsor (2006−2007)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,175	1,170
Geekbench 6 Single	195	315+62%
Geekbench 6 Multi	380	700+84%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 X2 4000+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-370M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ versus DDR3-1066 on the Core i3-370M — the Core i3-370M supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-370M supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 X2 4000+) vs 16 (Core i3-370M) — the Core i3-370M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: nForce 500,AMD 690G (Athlon 64 X2 4000+) and HM55 (Core i3-370M).

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 4000+	Core i3-370M
Socket	AM2	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	DDR3-1066+33%
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon 64 X2 4000+) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-370M). The Core i3-370M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 64 X2 4000+ targets Legacy Desktop, Core i3-370M targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-370M rivals AMD Athlon II P320.