Athlon 64 X2 4000+ vs Turion 64 X2 TL-50

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ vs Turion 64 X2 TL-50 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 X2 4000+

2 / 2

1,175

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Turion 64 X2 TL-50

2 / 2

1,184

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ vs Turion 64 X2 TL-50 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ vs Turion 64 X2 TL-50: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 89W instead of 512W, a 423W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Turion 64 X2 TL-50.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Turion 64 X2 TL-50 across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,175 vs 1,184).
❌Launch MSRP is still $328 MSRP, while Turion 64 X2 TL-50 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Turion 64 X2 TL-50

2006

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.3% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌475.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 89W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 64 X2 4000+.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion 64 X2 TL-50 better than Athlon 64 X2 4000+?

Yes. Turion 64 X2 TL-50 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion 64 X2 TL-50 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.3% more average FPS across 47 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion 64 X2 TL-50 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion 64 X2 TL-50 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Turion 64 X2 TL-50 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $328 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.3% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon 64 X2 4000+ only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2006 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (3.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM2.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Turion 64 X2 TL-50 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ vs Turion 64 X2 TL-50 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+

The Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,175 points. Launch price was $149.

Turion 64 X2 TL-50

The Turion 64 X2 TL-50 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 17 May 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Taylor (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,184 points. Launch price was $154.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Turion 64 X2 TL-50 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ versus 1.6 GHz on the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 4000+. The Athlon 64 X2 4000+ uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 uses Taylor (2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ scores 1,175 against the Turion 64 X2 TL-50's 1,184 — a 0.8% lead for the Turion 64 X2 TL-50.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 4000+	Turion 64 X2 TL-50
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz+25%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512K	512 kB
Process	90 nm	90 nm
Architecture	Windsor (2006−2007)	Taylor (2006)
PassMark	1,175	1,184
Geekbench 6 Single	195	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	380	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 X2 4000+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion 64 X2 TL-50 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 4000+	Turion 64 X2 TL-50
Socket	AM2	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	—
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon 64 X2 4000+) / not specified (Turion 64 X2 TL-50). Primary use case: Athlon 64 X2 4000+ targets Legacy Desktop.