Athlon 64 X2 4000+ vs Pentium A1020
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Pentium A1020
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is positioned at rank 1082 and the Pentium A1020 is on rank 1009, so the Pentium A1020 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Performance Per Dollar Pentium A1020
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 X2 4000+ | Pentium A1020 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($86) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 X2 4000+ | Pentium A1020 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+766%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($86) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Pentium A1020
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
The Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,175 points. Launch price was $149.
Pentium A1020
The Pentium A1020 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.41 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,167 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon 64 X2 4000+ packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium A1020 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium A1020 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ versus 2.7 GHz on the Pentium A1020 — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Pentium A1020. The Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is built on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ scores 1,175 against the Pentium A1020's 1,167 — a 0.7% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 4000+. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium A1020.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 4000+ | Pentium A1020 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2.7 GHz+35% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.41 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512K | — |
| Process | 90 nm | 22 nm-76% |
| Architecture | Windsor (2006−2007) | — |
| PassMark | 1,175 | 1,167 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 195 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 380 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 X2 4000+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium A1020 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 4000+ | Pentium A1020 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2 | FCBGA1170 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon 64 X2 4000+) / not specified (Pentium A1020). Primary use case: Athlon 64 X2 4000+ targets Legacy Desktop.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 4000+ | Pentium A1020 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Athlon 64 X2 4000+ launched at $328 MSRP, while the Pentium A1020 debuted at $86. At current prices ($10 vs $86), the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is $76 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ delivers 117.5 pts/$ vs 13.6 pts/$ for the Pentium A1020 — making the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ the 158.6% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 4000+ | Pentium A1020 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $328 | $86-74% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-88% | $86 |
| Performance per Dollar | 117.5+764% | 13.6 |
| Release Date | 2006 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Pentium A1020
