Athlon 64 X2 4000+ vs Celeron G465
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Celeron G465
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is positioned at rank 1082 and the Celeron G465 is on rank 867, so the Celeron G465 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 4000+
Performance Per Dollar Celeron G465
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Athlon 64 X2 4000+ | Celeron G465 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($37) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Athlon 64 X2 4000+ | Celeron G465 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+267%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($37) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Celeron G465
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
The Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,175 points. Launch price was $149.
Celeron G465
The Celeron G465 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $80.
Processing Power
The Athlon 64 X2 4000+ packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron G465 offers 1 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ versus 1.9 GHz on the Celeron G465 — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 4000+. The Athlon 64 X2 4000+ uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Celeron G465 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ scores 1,175 against the Celeron G465's 1,185 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron G465. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 195 vs 300, a 42.4% lead for the Celeron G465 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ vs 1.5 MB on the Celeron G465.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 4000+ | Celeron G465 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2+100% | 1 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz+5% | 1.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 1.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K+100% | 256 kB |
| Process | 90 nm | 32 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Windsor (2006−2007) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,175 | 1,185 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 195 | 300+54% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 380 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon 64 X2 4000+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron G465 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ versus DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G465 — the Celeron G465 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G465 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon 64 X2 4000+) vs 16 (Celeron G465) — the Celeron G465 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: nForce 500,AMD 690G (Athlon 64 X2 4000+) and H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G465).
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 4000+ | Celeron G465 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM2 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 2.0+82% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-800 | DDR3-1066+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 32 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon 64 X2 4000+) vs VT-x (Celeron G465). The Celeron G465 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon 64 X2 4000+ targets Legacy Desktop, Celeron G465 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G465 rivals Pentium G630.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 4000+ | Celeron G465 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Athlon 64 X2 4000+ launched at $328 MSRP, while the Celeron G465 debuted at $70. At current prices ($10 vs $37), the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is $27 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ delivers 117.5 pts/$ vs 32.0 pts/$ for the Celeron G465 — making the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ the 114.3% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon 64 X2 4000+ | Celeron G465 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $328 | $70-79% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-73% | $37 |
| Performance per Dollar | 117.5+267% | 32.0 |
| Release Date | 2006 | 2012 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon 64 X2 4000+ and Celeron G465
