Athlon 64 X2 4000+ vs Celeron M 723

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ vs Celeron M 723 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 X2 4000+

2 / 2

1,175

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron M 723

1 / 1

1,180

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ vs Celeron M 723 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ vs Celeron M 723: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+

2006

Why buy it

✅+95% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Celeron M 723.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.6 vs 7.3 PassMark/$ ($328 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
❌8800% higher power demand at 89W vs 1W.

Celeron M 723

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $167 less on MSRP ($161 MSRP vs $328 MSRP).
✅Delivers 104.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 7.3 vs 3.6 PassMark/$ ($161 MSRP vs $328 MSRP).
✅Draws 1W instead of 89W, a 88W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (100 vs 195).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (100 vs 380).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon 64 X2 4000+.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 X2 4000+ better than Celeron M 723?

Yes. Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data and 280% better Geekbench multi-core, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.8% more average FPS across 47 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 280% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Athlon 64 X2 4000+ comes in 103.7% more expensive on MSRP at $328 MSRP versus $161 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.8% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron M 723 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron M 723 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2008 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+ vs Celeron M 723 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 X2 4000+

The Athlon 64 X2 4000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,175 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron M 723

The Celeron M 723 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,180 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 X2 4000+ packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron M 723 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ versus 1.2 GHz on the Celeron M 723 — a 50% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 4000+. The Athlon 64 X2 4000+ uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Celeron M 723 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ scores 1,175 against the Celeron M 723's 1,180 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron M 723. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 195 vs 100, a 64.4% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 380 vs 100 (116.7% advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 4000+).

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 4000+	Celeron M 723
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2 GHz+67%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512K+51100%	1 MB
Process	90 nm	45 nm-50%
Architecture	Windsor (2006−2007)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,175	1,180
Geekbench 6 Single	195+95%	100
Geekbench 6 Multi	380+280%	100

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 X2 4000+ uses the AM2 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron M 723 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-800 memory speed. The Celeron M 723 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: nForce 500,AMD 690G (Athlon 64 X2 4000+) and GS45 (Celeron M 723).

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 4000+	Celeron M 723
Socket	AM2	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon 64 X2 4000+) vs None (Celeron M 723). Primary use case: Athlon 64 X2 4000+ targets Legacy Desktop, Celeron M 723 targets Legacy Embedded. Direct competitor: Celeron M 723 rivals Core Solo U2100.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 4000+	Celeron M 723
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	None
Target Use	Legacy Desktop	Legacy Embedded

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ was priced at $328, while the Celeron M 723 came in at $161. On launch pricing ($328 vs $161), Celeron M 723 was $167 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 X2 4000+ delivers 3.6 pts/$ vs 7.3 pts/$ for the Celeron M 723 — making the Celeron M 723 the 68.7% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 64 X2 4000+	Celeron M 723
MSRP	$328	$161-51%
Performance per Dollar	3.6	7.3+103%
Release Date	2006	2008

Search Athlon 64 X2 4000+ on Amazon

Search Celeron M 723 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.