Core i3-380M vs Pentium E6700

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-380M vs Pentium E6700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-380M vs Pentium E6700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-380M

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $37 less on MSRP ($49 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅Delivers 74.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 24.7 vs 14.2 PassMark/$ ($49 MSRP vs $86 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Gen 1), while Pentium E6700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,212 vs 1,219).

Pentium E6700

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.2 vs 24.7 PassMark/$ ($86 MSRP vs $49 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-380M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium E6700 better than Core i3-380M?

Yes. Pentium E6700 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium E6700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium E6700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium E6700 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium E6700 comes in 75.5% more expensive on MSRP at $86 MSRP versus $49 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-380M only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 74.5% better value on paper (24.7 vs 14.2 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium E6700 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core i3-380M vs Pentium E6700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-380M

The Core i3-380M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 October 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 0.53 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,212 points. Launch price was $49.

Pentium E6700

The Pentium E6700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,219 points. Launch price was $80.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-380M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium E6700's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.53 GHz on the Core i3-380M versus 3.2 GHz on the Pentium E6700 — a 143.2% clock advantage for the Pentium E6700 (base: 2.53 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i3-380M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium E6700 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-380M scores 1,212 against the Pentium E6700's 1,219 — a 0.6% lead for the Pentium E6700. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-380M vs 0 kB on the Pentium E6700.

Feature	Core i3-380M	Pentium E6700
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	0.53 GHz	3.2 GHz+504%
Base Clock	2.53 GHz	3.2 GHz+26%
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB (total)
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,212	1,219
Geekbench 6 Single	450	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,100	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-380M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium E6700 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i3-380M) vs 0 (Pentium E6700) — the Core i3-380M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i3-380M	Pentium E6700
Socket	PGA988	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Core i3-380M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Gen 1)), while the Pentium E6700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-380M targets Legacy Laptop, Pentium E6700 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-380M rivals AMD Athlon II P320.

Feature	Core i3-380M	Pentium E6700
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Gen 1)	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x
Target Use	Legacy Laptop	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-380M was priced at $49, while the Pentium E6700 came in at $86. On launch pricing ($49 vs $86), Core i3-380M was $37 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-380M delivers 24.7 pts/$ vs 14.2 pts/$ for the Pentium E6700 — making the Core i3-380M the 54.3% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-380M	Pentium E6700
MSRP	$49-43%	$86
Performance per Dollar	24.7+74%	14.2
Release Date	2010	2010

Search Core i3-380M on Amazon

Search Pentium E6700 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.