Core i3-4005U vs Core M-5Y10

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4005U vs Core M-5Y10 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4005U vs Core M-5Y10: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4005U

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).

Core M-5Y10

2014

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,644 vs 1,652).
❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Core i3-4005U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core M-5Y10 better than Core i3-4005U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core M-5Y10 is ahead with a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4005U pulls ahead with 0.5% better PassMark. Core M-5Y10 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4005U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core M-5Y10 is the better buy right now. Core M-5Y10 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $281 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i3-4005U is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.5% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core M-5Y10 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013) and 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-4005U vs Core M-5Y10 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4005U

The Core i3-4005U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,652 points. Launch price was $69.

Core M-5Y10

The Core M-5Y10 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,644 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-4005U and Core M-5Y10 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Core i3-4005U versus 2 GHz on the Core M-5Y10 — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Core M-5Y10 (base: 1.7 GHz vs 0.8 GHz). The Core i3-4005U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core M-5Y10 uses Broadwell-Y (2014) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4005U scores 1,652 against the Core M-5Y10's 1,644 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i3-4005U. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4005U vs 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y10.

Feature	Core i3-4005U	Core M-5Y10
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.7 GHz	2 GHz+18%
Base Clock	1.7 GHz+112%	0.8 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Broadwell-Y (2014)
PassMark	1,652	1,644

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4005U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core M-5Y10 uses FCBGA1234 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.