Core i3-4005U vs Turion II Ultra M620

Core i3-4005U vs Turion II Ultra M620 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-4005U

2 / 4

1,652

0.0%

1,665

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4005U vs Turion II Ultra M620 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4005U vs Turion II Ultra M620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4005U

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Turion II Ultra M620 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,652 vs 1,665).
❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Turion II Ultra M620

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion II Ultra M620 better than Core i3-4005U?

Yes. Turion II Ultra M620 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion II Ultra M620 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion II Ultra M620 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion II Ultra M620 still makes the most sense overall. Turion II Ultra M620 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4005U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-4005U vs Turion II Ultra M620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4005U

The Core i3-4005U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,652 points. Launch price was $69.

Turion II Ultra M620

The Turion II Ultra M620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g3. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,665 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-4005U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Turion II Ultra M620's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Core i3-4005U versus 2.5 GHz on the Turion II Ultra M620 — a 38.1% clock advantage for the Turion II Ultra M620. The Core i3-4005U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Turion II Ultra M620 uses Caspian (2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4005U scores 1,652 against the Turion II Ultra M620's 1,665 — a 0.8% lead for the Turion II Ultra M620.

Feature	Core i3-4005U	Turion II Ultra M620
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.7 GHz	2.5 GHz+47%
Base Clock	1.7 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Caspian (2009)
PassMark	1,652	1,665

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4005U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion II Ultra M620 uses S1g3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.