Core i3-4030U
VS
Atom x7-E3950

Core i3-4030U vs Atom x7-E3950

Intel

Core i3-4030U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Atom x7-E3950

4 Cores4 Thrd12 WWMax: 2 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-4030U is positioned at rank 75 and the Atom x7-E3950 is on rank 480, so the Core i3-4030U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4030U

#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
96%
#63
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
235%
#64
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
231%
#65
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
212%
#66
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
211%
#67
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
209%
#69
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
202%
#70
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
194%
#71
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
193%
#72
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
188%
#75
Core i3-4030U
MSRP: $281|Avg: N/A
100%
#79
Atom D2500
MSRP: $42|Avg: N/A
97%
#88
Core 2 Duo T7500
MSRP: $316|Avg: $5
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x7-E3950

#153
Core i7-1370P
MSRP: $438|Avg: $280
98%
#467
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
630%
#468
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
620%
#469
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
570%
#470
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
567%
#471
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
562%
#473
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
542%
#474
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
520%
#475
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
519%
#476
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
505%
#480
Atom x7-E3950
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#487
Processor U300
MSRP: $193|Avg: $180
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Atom x7-E3950 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-4030U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-4030UAtom x7-E3950
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Apollo Lake (2014−2016) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-4030UAtom x7-E3950
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-4030U and Atom x7-E3950

Intel

Core i3-4030U

The Core i3-4030U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,876 points. Launch price was $281.

Intel

Atom x7-E3950

The Atom x7-E3950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 12 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,864 points. Launch price was $57.

Processing Power

The Core i3-4030U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom x7-E3950 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom x7-E3950 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Core i3-4030U versus 2 GHz on the Atom x7-E3950 — a 5.1% clock advantage for the Atom x7-E3950 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core i3-4030U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Atom x7-E3950 uses Apollo Lake (2014−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4030U scores 1,876 against the Atom x7-E3950's 1,864 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-4030U. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-4030U vs 0 kB on the Atom x7-E3950.

FeatureCore i3-4030UAtom x7-E3950
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
1.9 GHz
2 GHz+5%
Base Clock
1.9 GHz+19%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
2 MB (total)+300%
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
PassMark
1,876
1,864
Geekbench 6 Single
245
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4030U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom x7-E3950 uses FCBGA1296 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i3-4030UAtom x7-E3950
Socket
FCBGA1168
FCBGA1296
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
4
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
6
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-4030U) / VT-x, VT-d (Atom x7-E3950). The Atom x7-E3950 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 505), while the Core i3-4030U requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore i3-4030UAtom x7-E3950
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 505
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d