
Core i3-4030U

Core i5-2510E
Core i3-4030U vs Core i5-2510E Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-4030U vs Core i5-2510E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-4030U vs Core i5-2510E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-4030U
2014Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,876 vs 1,884).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.7 vs 8.2 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $230 MSRP).
- ❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-2510E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-2510E
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($230 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 22.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 8.2 vs 6.7 PassMark/$ ($230 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Core i3-4030U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-2510E better than Core i3-4030U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-4030U vs Core i5-2510E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4030U
The Core i3-4030U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,876 points. Launch price was $281.

Core i5-2510E
The Core i5-2510E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,884 points. Launch price was $266.
Processing Power
Both the Core i3-4030U and Core i5-2510E share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Core i3-4030U versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-2510E — a 48% clock advantage for the Core i5-2510E (base: 1.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i3-4030U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-2510E uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4030U scores 1,876 against the Core i5-2510E's 1,884 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-2510E. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-4030U vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2510E.
| Feature | Core i3-4030U | Core i5-2510E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 1.9 GHz | 3.1 GHz+63% |
| Base Clock | 1.9 GHz | 2.5 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm-31% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,876 | 1,884 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 527 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-4030U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-2510E uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-4030U | Core i5-2510E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1168 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i3-4030U) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-2510E). The Core i5-2510E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Core i3-4030U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2510E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i5-2510E rivals Embedded R-Series.
| Feature | Core i3-4030U | Core i5-2510E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | — | Embedded |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-4030U was priced at $281, while the Core i5-2510E came in at $230. On launch pricing ($281 vs $230), Core i5-2510E was $51 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-4030U delivers 6.7 pts/$ vs 8.2 pts/$ for the Core i5-2510E — making the Core i5-2510E the 20.4% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-4030U | Core i5-2510E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $281 | $230-18% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.7 | 8.2+22% |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2011 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














