A6-3620 vs Core i3-4030U

A6-3620 vs Core i3-4030U Performance Spectrum

A6-3620

4 / 4

1,877

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-4030U

2 / 4

1,876

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-3620 vs Core i3-4030U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-3620 vs Core i3-4030U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-3620

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 6530D, while Core i3-4030U needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-4030U.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-4030U

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,876 vs 1,877).
❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while A6-3620 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-3620 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A6-3620.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-3620 better than Core i3-4030U?

Yes. A6-3620 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6-3620 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-3620 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-3620 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. A6-3620 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-4030U only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 2.1% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4030U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-3620 vs Core i3-4030U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-3620

The A6-3620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,877 points. Launch price was $70.

Core i3-4030U

The Core i3-4030U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,876 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-3620 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4030U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A6-3620 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A6-3620 versus 1.9 GHz on the Core i3-4030U — a 27.3% clock advantage for the A6-3620 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The A6-3620 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-4030U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A6-3620 scores 1,877 against the Core i3-4030U's 1,876 — a 0.1% lead for the A6-3620. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-3620 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-4030U.

Feature	A6-3620	Core i3-4030U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz+32%	1.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+16%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,877	1,876
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-3620 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4030U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A6-3620	Core i3-4030U
Socket	FM1	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A6-3620) / not specified (Core i3-4030U). The A6-3620 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6530D), while the Core i3-4030U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3620 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A6-3620 rivals Pentium G840.