A6-3620 vs Core i7-2677M

A6-3620 vs Core i7-2677M Performance Spectrum

A6-3620

4 / 4

1,877

+0.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-2677M

2 / 4

1,875

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-3620 vs Core i7-2677M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-3620 vs Core i7-2677M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-3620

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-2677M.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (300 vs 562).
❌282.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 17W.

Core i7-2677M

2011

Why buy it

✅+87.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 17W instead of 65W, a 48W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,875 vs 1,877).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A6-3620.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-3620 better than Core i7-2677M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-2677M is ahead with a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A6-3620 pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-3620 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-3620 still makes the most sense overall. A6-3620 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-3620 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-3620 vs Core i7-2677M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-3620

The A6-3620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,877 points. Launch price was $70.

Core i7-2677M

The Core i7-2677M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,875 points. Launch price was $317.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-3620 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-2677M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A6-3620 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A6-3620 versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i7-2677M — a 14.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-2677M (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The A6-3620 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-2677M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6-3620 scores 1,877 against the Core i7-2677M's 1,875 — a 0.1% lead for the A6-3620. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 300 vs 562, a 60.8% lead for the Core i7-2677M that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-3620 vs 4 MB on the Core i7-2677M.

Feature	A6-3620	Core i7-2677M
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	2.9 GHz+16%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+22%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	4 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+100%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,877	1,875
Geekbench 6 Single	300	562+87%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-3620 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-2677M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A6-3620 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i7-2677M — the A6-3620 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-3620 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75 (A6-3620) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67,UM67 (Core i7-2677M).

Feature	A6-3620	Core i7-2677M
Socket	FM1	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866+40%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-3620) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2677M). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 6530D (A6-3620) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i7-2677M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3620 targets Budget Desktop, Core i7-2677M targets Ultrabook. Direct competitor: A6-3620 rivals Pentium G840; Core i7-2677M rivals A6-3420M.

Feature	A6-3620	Core i7-2677M
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 6530D	HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Budget Desktop	Ultrabook