A6-3620 vs Pentium G3220

A6-3620 vs Pentium G3220 Performance Spectrum

A6-3620

4 / 4

1,877

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium G3220

2 / 2

1,885

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-3620 vs Pentium G3220 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-3620 vs Pentium G3220: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-3620

2011

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Pentium G3220.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,877 vs 1,885).
❌20.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 54W.

Pentium G3220

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 54W instead of 65W, a 11W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $54 MSRP, while A6-3620 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A6-3620.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium G3220 better than A6-3620?

Yes. Pentium G3220 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium G3220 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium G3220 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium G3220 is the better buy right now. Pentium G3220 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $54 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (34.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium G3220 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-3620 vs Pentium G3220 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-3620

The A6-3620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,877 points. Launch price was $70.

Pentium G3220

The Pentium G3220 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,885 points. Launch price was $71.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-3620 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium G3220 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A6-3620 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A6-3620 versus 3 GHz on the Pentium G3220 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Pentium G3220 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3 GHz). The A6-3620 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium G3220 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A6-3620 scores 1,877 against the Pentium G3220's 1,885 — a 0.4% lead for the Pentium G3220. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-3620 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G3220.

Feature	A6-3620	Pentium G3220
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	3 GHz+20%
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	3 GHz+36%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,877	1,885
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-3620 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium G3220 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A6-3620 versus DDR3-1333 on the Pentium G3220 — the A6-3620 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium G3220 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	A6-3620	Pentium G3220
Socket	FM1	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866+40%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-3620) vs VT-x (Pentium G3220). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 6530D (A6-3620) and HD Graphics (Pentium G3220) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3620 targets Budget Desktop, Pentium G3220 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A6-3620 rivals Pentium G840.