A6-3620 vs Core i5-2515E

A6-3620 vs Core i5-2515E Performance Spectrum

A6-3620

4 / 4

1,877

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-2515E

2 / 4

1,882

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-3620 vs Core i5-2515E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-3620 vs Core i5-2515E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-3620

2011

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i5-2515E.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (300 vs 530).
❌Lower PassMark (1,877 vs 1,882).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Core i5-2515E

2011

Why buy it

✅+76.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A6-3620.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-2515E better than A6-3620?

Yes. Core i5-2515E is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-2515E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-2515E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-2515E still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-2515E comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-2515E is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

A6-3620 vs Core i5-2515E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-3620

The A6-3620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,877 points. Launch price was $70.

Core i5-2515E

The Core i5-2515E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,882 points. Launch price was $266.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-3620 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-2515E offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A6-3620 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A6-3620 versus 2.5 GHz on the Core i5-2515E — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The A6-3620 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-2515E uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A6-3620 scores 1,877 against the Core i5-2515E's 1,882 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-2515E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 300 vs 530, a 55.4% lead for the Core i5-2515E that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-3620 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2515E.

Feature	A6-3620	Core i5-2515E
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.5 GHz	2.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.5 GHz+14%
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Llano (2011−2012)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,877	1,882
Geekbench 6 Single	300	530+77%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-3620 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-2515E uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A6-3620 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-2515E — the A6-3620 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75 (A6-3620) and HM65,QM67 (Core i5-2515E).

Feature	A6-3620	Core i5-2515E
Socket	FM1	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866+40%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-3620) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-2515E). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 6530D (A6-3620) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i5-2515E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3620 targets Budget Desktop, Core i5-2515E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: A6-3620 rivals Pentium G840; Core i5-2515E rivals Embedded R-Series.

Feature	A6-3620	Core i5-2515E
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 6530D	HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Budget Desktop	Embedded