A6-3620
VS
Core M-5Y70

A6-3620 vs Core M-5Y70

AMD

A6-3620

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core M-5Y70

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-3620 is positioned at rank 580 and the Core M-5Y70 is on rank 1171, so the A6-3620 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-3620

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
9965%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9416%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6837%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2060%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1631%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1427%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
817%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
807%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
735%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
735%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
726%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
707%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
697%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
694%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
688%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
98%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
97%
#580
A6-3620
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#581
Core i3-6100T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $20
99%
#582
Athlon X4 970
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
99%
#583
FX-8370
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
99%
#584
Pentium G4520
MSRP: $86|Avg: $45
99%
#585
Core i3-4170
MSRP: $117|Avg: $40
99%
#586
Celeron G460
MSRP: $37|Avg: $10
99%
#587
A4 PRO-7350B
MSRP: $50|Avg: $11
99%
#589
Pentium G3220T
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
98%
#590
Celeron G1620
MSRP: $52|Avg: $40
98%
#591
Core i5-7600T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $60
97%
#593
Core i3-7300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $128
96%
#594
Celeron G1830
MSRP: $52|Avg: $5
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core M-5Y70

#1159
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4360%
#1160
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4296%
#1161
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3944%
#1162
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3926%
#1163
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3890%
#1165
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3756%
#1166
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3602%
#1167
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3596%
#1168
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3499%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
99%
#1176
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
97%
#1177
Athlon PRO 3045B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $180
97%
#1178
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
97%
#1179
Core 2 Duo T5600
MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A
96%
#1180
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
96%
#1181
Core i7-7Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $285
96%
#1183
Core i7-4500U
MSRP: $398|Avg: N/A
93%
#1185
Athlon Neo X2 L325
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
91%
#1186
Core i3-2370M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core M-5Y70 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the A6-3620 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.7% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightA6-3620Core M-5Y70
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-Y (2014) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA6-3620Core M-5Y70
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-3620 and Core M-5Y70

AMD

A6-3620

The A6-3620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,877 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Core M-5Y70

The Core M-5Y70 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,890 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The A6-3620 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core M-5Y70 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A6-3620 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the A6-3620 versus 2.6 GHz on the Core M-5Y70 — a 3.9% clock advantage for the Core M-5Y70 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A6-3620 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core M-5Y70 uses Broadwell-Y (2014) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A6-3620 scores 1,877 against the Core M-5Y70's 1,890 — a 0.7% lead for the Core M-5Y70. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-3620 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y70.

FeatureA6-3620Core M-5Y70
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz+4%
Base Clock
2.2 GHz+100%
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+300%
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Llano (2011−2012)
Broadwell-Y (2014)
PassMark
1,877
1,890
Geekbench 6 Single
300
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-3620 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core M-5Y70 uses FCBGA1234 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA6-3620Core M-5Y70
Socket
FM1
FCBGA1234
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A6-3620) / not specified (Core M-5Y70). The A6-3620 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 6530D), while the Core M-5Y70 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3620 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A6-3620 rivals Pentium G840.

FeatureA6-3620Core M-5Y70
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6530D
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Desktop