Core i3-4030U vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84

Core i3-4030U vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-4030U

2 / 4

1,876

0.0%

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84

2 / 2

1,886

+0.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4030U vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4030U vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4030U

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,876 vs 1,886).
❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 better than Core i3-4030U?

Yes. Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i3-4030U only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 2.5% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4030U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-4030U vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4030U

The Core i3-4030U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,876 points. Launch price was $281.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84

The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,886 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-4030U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.9 GHz on the Core i3-4030U versus 2.3 GHz on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 — a 19% clock advantage for the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84. The Core i3-4030U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 uses Puma (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4030U scores 1,876 against the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84's 1,886 — a 0.5% lead for the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-4030U vs 0 kB on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84.

Feature	Core i3-4030U	Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.9 GHz	2.3 GHz+21%
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	2 MB+300%
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Puma (2008−2009)
PassMark	1,876	1,886

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4030U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 uses S1g2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.