Core i3-4030Y vs Core M-5Y10

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4030Y vs Core M-5Y10 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4030Y vs Core M-5Y10: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4030Y

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).

Core M-5Y10

2014

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,644 vs 1,654).
❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Core i3-4030Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4030Y better than Core M-5Y10?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core M-5Y10 is ahead with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4030Y pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark. Core M-5Y10 also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4030Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4030Y is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Core i3-4030Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $281 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. Core M-5Y10 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 0.6% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4030Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-4030Y vs Core M-5Y10 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4030Y

The Core i3-4030Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,654 points. Launch price was $281.

Core M-5Y10

The Core M-5Y10 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.8 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,644 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-4030Y and Core M-5Y10 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Core i3-4030Y versus 2 GHz on the Core M-5Y10 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core M-5Y10 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 0.8 GHz). The Core i3-4030Y uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core M-5Y10 uses Broadwell-Y (2014) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-4030Y scores 1,654 against the Core M-5Y10's 1,644 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-4030Y. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i3-4030Y vs 4 MB (total) on the Core M-5Y10.

Feature	Core i3-4030Y	Core M-5Y10
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2 GHz+25%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz+100%	0.8 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB	4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Broadwell-Y (2014)
PassMark	1,654	1,644

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-4030Y uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core M-5Y10 uses FCBGA1234 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.