Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Core i3-4030Y

Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Core i3-4030Y Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 FX-74

2 / 2

1,658

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-4030Y

2 / 4

1,654

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Core i3-4030Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Core i3-4030Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 FX-74

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 125W instead of 512W, a 387W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $499 MSRP, while Core i3-4030Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i3-4030Y

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,654 vs 1,658).
❌309.6% higher power demand at 512W vs 125W.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 FX-74 better than Core i3-4030Y?

Yes. Athlon 64 FX-74 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 36 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon 64 FX-74 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 36 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 FX-74 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 64 FX-74 is the better buy right now. Athlon 64 FX-74 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $499 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 36 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (3.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4030Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Core i3-4030Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 FX-74

The Athlon 64 FX-74 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Novembro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: F. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,658 points. Launch price was $500.

Core i3-4030Y

The Core i3-4030Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,654 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 FX-74 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-4030Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-74 versus 1.6 GHz on the Core i3-4030Y — a 60.9% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 FX-74. The Athlon 64 FX-74 uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Core i3-4030Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-74 scores 1,658 against the Core i3-4030Y's 1,654 — a 0.2% lead for the Athlon 64 FX-74. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 FX-74 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-4030Y.

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-74	Core i3-4030Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3 GHz+87%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	512 kB
Process	90 nm	22 nm-76%
Architecture	Windsor (2006−2007)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,658	1,654
Geekbench 6 Single	400	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	750	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 FX-74 uses the F socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-4030Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-74	Core i3-4030Y
Socket	F	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon 64 FX-74) / not specified (Core i3-4030Y). Primary use case: Athlon 64 FX-74 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon 64 FX-74 rivals Pentium Extreme Edition 965.