Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Turion II Ultra M620

Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Turion II Ultra M620 Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 FX-74

2 / 2

1,658

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Turion II Ultra M620

2 / 2

1,665

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Turion II Ultra M620 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Turion II Ultra M620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 FX-74

2006

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,658 vs 1,665).
❌Launch MSRP is still $499 MSRP, while Turion II Ultra M620 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌6150% higher power demand at 125W vs 2W.

Turion II Ultra M620

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 125W, a 123W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion II Ultra M620 better than Athlon 64 FX-74?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon 64 FX-74 is ahead with a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Turion II Ultra M620 pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion II Ultra M620 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion II Ultra M620 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Turion II Ultra M620 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $499 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. Athlon 64 FX-74 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2006 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (3.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on F.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Turion II Ultra M620 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2009 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Turion II Ultra M620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 FX-74

The Athlon 64 FX-74 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Novembro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: F. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,658 points. Launch price was $500.

Turion II Ultra M620

The Turion II Ultra M620 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g3. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,665 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 FX-74 and Turion II Ultra M620 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-74 versus 2.5 GHz on the Turion II Ultra M620 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 FX-74. The Athlon 64 FX-74 uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Turion II Ultra M620 uses Caspian (2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-74 scores 1,658 against the Turion II Ultra M620's 1,665 — a 0.4% lead for the Turion II Ultra M620.

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-74	Turion II Ultra M620
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3 GHz+20%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	90 nm	45 nm-50%
Architecture	Windsor (2006−2007)	Caspian (2009)
PassMark	1,658	1,665
Geekbench 6 Single	400	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	750	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 FX-74 uses the F socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Turion II Ultra M620 uses S1g3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-74	Turion II Ultra M620
Socket	F	S1g3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon 64 FX-74) / not specified (Turion II Ultra M620). Primary use case: Athlon 64 FX-74 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon 64 FX-74 rivals Pentium Extreme Edition 965.