Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Athlon 64 X2 5600+

Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Athlon 64 X2 5600+ Performance Spectrum

Athlon 64 FX-74

2 / 2

1,658

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon 64 X2 5600+

2 / 2

1,665

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Athlon 64 X2 5600+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Athlon 64 X2 5600+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon 64 FX-74

2006

Why buy it

✅Costs $6 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $505 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,658 vs 1,665).
❌40.4% higher power demand at 125W vs 89W.

Athlon 64 X2 5600+

2006

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 89W instead of 125W, a 36W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌
1.2% HIGHER MSRP
$505 MSRPvs$499 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon 64 X2 5600+ better than Athlon 64 FX-74?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon 64 FX-74 is ahead with a 2.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 X2 5600+ pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon 64 X2 5600+ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon 64 X2 5600+ is still the much better call for a fresh build. Athlon 64 X2 5600+ comes in 1.2% more expensive on MSRP at $505 MSRP versus $499 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. Athlon 64 FX-74 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2006 platform. Even with 0.8% better value on paper (3.3 vs 3.3 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on F.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Athlon 64 X2 5600+ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Athlon 64 X2 5600+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon 64 FX-74

The Athlon 64 FX-74 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Novembro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: F. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,658 points. Launch price was $500.

Athlon 64 X2 5600+

The Athlon 64 X2 5600+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,665 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Athlon 64 FX-74 and Athlon 64 X2 5600+ share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-74 versus 2.9 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ — a 3.4% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 FX-74. Both are built on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture using a 90 nm process. In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-74 scores 1,658 against the Athlon 64 X2 5600+'s 1,665 — a 0.4% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 5600+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-74	Athlon 64 X2 5600+
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3 GHz+3%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	512K+51100%
Process	90 nm	90 nm
Architecture	Windsor (2006−2007)	Windsor (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,658	1,665
Geekbench 6 Single	400	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	750	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 FX-74 uses the F socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ uses AM2 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2 on the Athlon 64 FX-74 versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ — the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ supports 39900% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon 64 FX-74) vs 0 (Athlon 64 X2 5600+) — the Athlon 64 FX-74 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: nForce 680a (Athlon 64 FX-74) and AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 5600+).

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-74	Athlon 64 X2 5600+
Socket	F	AM2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR2	DDR2-800+39900%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon 64 FX-74) / not specified (Athlon 64 X2 5600+). Primary use case: Athlon 64 FX-74 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon 64 FX-74 rivals Pentium Extreme Edition 965.

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-74	Athlon 64 X2 5600+
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon 64 FX-74 was priced at $499, while the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ came in at $505. On launch pricing ($499 vs $505), Athlon 64 FX-74 was $6 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon 64 FX-74 delivers 3.3 pts/$ vs 3.3 pts/$ for the Athlon 64 X2 5600+ — making the Athlon 64 FX-74 the 0.8% better value option.

Feature	Athlon 64 FX-74	Athlon 64 X2 5600+
MSRP	$499-1%	$505
Performance per Dollar	3.3	3.3
Release Date	2006	2006

Search Athlon 64 FX-74 on Amazon

Search Athlon 64 X2 5600+ on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.