Athlon 64 FX-74
VS
Phenom X4 9350e

Athlon 64 FX-74 vs Phenom X4 9350e

AMD

Athlon 64 FX-74

2 Cores2 Thrd125 WWMax: 3 GHz2006
VS
AMD

Phenom X4 9350e

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 2 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon 64 FX-74 is positioned at rank 1087 and the Phenom X4 9350e is on rank 384, so the Phenom X4 9350e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 FX-74

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
93890%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
88717%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
64416%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
19406%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
15371%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
13447%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
7702%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
7601%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
6921%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
6920%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
6843%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
6658%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
6565%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
6539%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
6480%
#1087
Athlon 64 FX-74
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
100%
#1088
Athlon 64 X2 5600+
MSRP: $505|Avg: $15
99%
#1089
Core 2 Extreme QX9770
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
99%
#1090
Athlon 64 2000+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
99%
#1091
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
MSRP: $485|Avg: $78
98%
#1092
Celeron 2.30
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
98%
#1093
Phenom X4 9450e
MSRP: $450|Avg: $430
97%
#1094
Athlon 64 X2 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $20
93%
#1095
Athlon 64 3000+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $10
91%
#1096
Athlon XP 3100+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
85%
#1097
Athlon 64 3300+
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
79%
#1098
Athlon 64 2800+
MSRP: $178|Avg: $15
71%
#1099
Athlon 64 3700+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $20
69%
#1100
Athlon 64 FX-72
MSRP: $799|Avg: $40
68%
#1101
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
MSRP: $581|Avg: $110
65%
#1102
Athlon 64 3500+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $10
63%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom X4 9350e

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5637%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5326%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3867%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1165%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
923%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
807%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
462%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
456%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
416%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
415%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
411%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
400%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
394%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
393%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
389%
#329
Core i5-11600T
MSRP: $262|Avg: $262
100%
#330
Core i9-9900K
MSRP: $488|Avg: $331
99%
#331
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
MSRP: $899|Avg: $540
99%
#332
Celeron G4930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
98%
#333
Core i9-9920X
MSRP: $1189|Avg: $464
97%
#384
Phenom X4 9350e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#385
Pentium G4560
MSRP: $64|Avg: $85
100%
#392
A10-7860K
MSRP: $117|Avg: N/A
98%
#393
Athlon X4 845
MSRP: $70|Avg: $15
97%
#395
Celeron G3930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $25
97%
#396
Ryzen 3 1300X
MSRP: $129|Avg: $54
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Athlon 64 FX-74 leads in gaming performance. However, the Phenom X4 9350e is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightAthlon 64 FX-74Phenom X4 9350e
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Agena (2007−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightAthlon 64 FX-74Phenom X4 9350e
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon 64 FX-74 and Phenom X4 9350e

AMD

Athlon 64 FX-74

The Athlon 64 FX-74 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Novembro 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: F. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,658 points. Launch price was $500.

AMD

Phenom X4 9350e

The Phenom X4 9350e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,659 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Athlon 64 FX-74 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Phenom X4 9350e offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom X4 9350e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-74 versus 2 GHz on the Phenom X4 9350e — a 40% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 FX-74. The Athlon 64 FX-74 uses the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture (90 nm), while the Phenom X4 9350e uses Agena (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon 64 FX-74 scores 1,658 against the Phenom X4 9350e's 1,659 — a 0.1% lead for the Phenom X4 9350e. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon 64 FX-74 vs 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9350e.

FeatureAthlon 64 FX-74Phenom X4 9350e
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
3 GHz+50%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512 kB (per core)
Process
90 nm
65 nm-28%
Architecture
Windsor (2006−2007)
Agena (2007−2008)
PassMark
1,658
1,659
Geekbench 6 Single
400
Geekbench 6 Multi
750
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon 64 FX-74 uses the F socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Phenom X4 9350e uses AM2+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureAthlon 64 FX-74Phenom X4 9350e
Socket
F
AM2+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon 64 FX-74) / not specified (Phenom X4 9350e). Primary use case: Athlon 64 FX-74 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon 64 FX-74 rivals Pentium Extreme Edition 965.

FeatureAthlon 64 FX-74Phenom X4 9350e
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget