Core i3-4010U vs Core i3-4030Y

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-4010U vs Core i3-4030Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-4010U vs Core i3-4030Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-4010U

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.2% higher average FPS across 34 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4400, while Core i3-4030Y needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-4030Y

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i3-4010U across 34 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (1,654 vs 1,660).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-4010U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-4010U better than Core i3-4030Y?

Yes. Core i3-4010U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 34 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4010U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.2% more average FPS across 34 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4010U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-4010U still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-4010U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.2% average FPS lead across 34 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-4030Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-4010U vs Core i3-4030Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-4010U

The Core i3-4010U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,660 points. Launch price was $281.

Core i3-4030Y

The Core i3-4030Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,654 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i3-4010U and Core i3-4030Y share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.7 GHz on the Core i3-4010U versus 1.6 GHz on the Core i3-4030Y — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-4010U (base: 1.7 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). Both are built on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i3-4010U scores 1,660 against the Core i3-4030Y's 1,654 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-4010U. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4010U vs 3 MB on the Core i3-4030Y.

Feature	Core i3-4010U	Core i3-4030Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	1.7 GHz+6%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.7 GHz+6%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	3 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,660	1,654

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FCBGA1168 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Core i3-4010U	Core i3-4030Y
Socket	FCBGA1168	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4010U) / not specified (Core i3-4030Y). The Core i3-4010U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Core i3-4030Y requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-4010U targets Mobile.