A6-5200 vs Core i3-4010U
A6-5200
Core i3-4010U
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-5200 is positioned at rank 736 and the Core i3-4010U is on rank 179, so the Core i3-4010U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A6-5200
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4010U
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A6-5200 | Core i3-4010U |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Kabini (2013−2014) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A6-5200 | Core i3-4010U |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A6-5200 and Core i3-4010U
A6-5200
The A6-5200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,672 points. Launch price was $70.
Core i3-4010U
The Core i3-4010U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,660 points. Launch price was $281.
Processing Power
The A6-5200 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4010U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A6-5200 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the A6-5200 versus 1.7 GHz on the Core i3-4010U — a 16.2% clock advantage for the A6-5200. The A6-5200 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-4010U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A6-5200 scores 1,672 against the Core i3-4010U's 1,660 — a 0.7% lead for the A6-5200. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-5200 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-4010U.
| Feature | A6-5200 | Core i3-4010U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz+18% | 1.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+700% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm | 22 nm-21% |
| Architecture | Kabini (2013−2014) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 1,672 | 1,660 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 215 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A6-5200 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4010U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The Core i3-4010U supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-5200) vs 2 (Core i3-4010U). PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-5200) vs 12 (Core i3-4010U) — the Core i3-4010U offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A6-5200 | Core i3-4010U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | FCBGA1168 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR3L-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 12+50% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-5200) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-4010U). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8400 (A6-5200) and HD Graphics 4400 (Core i3-4010U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5200 targets Entry Laptop, Core i3-4010U targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A6-5200 rivals Pentium N3510.
| Feature | A6-5200 | Core i3-4010U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8400 | HD Graphics 4400 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Entry Laptop | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A6-5200 and Core i3-4010U
