GeForce FX 5200 vs Radeon HD 6310

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5200

2025Core: 2017 MHzBoost: 2407 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6310

2011Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce FX 5200 vs Radeon HD 6310 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5200 vs Radeon HD 6310 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5200 vs Radeon HD 6310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5200

2025

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6310 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 40% HIGHER MSRP
    $70 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 209.1% higher power demand at 575W vs 186W.

Radeon HD 6310

2011

Why buy it

  • 200.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $20 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
  • Delivers 2035% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
  • Draws 186W instead of 575W, a 389W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6310 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 200.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1425% in PassMark G3D (122 vs 8), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce FX 5200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 40nm, 170 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2011. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6310 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $70, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2035% (2.4 vs 0.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6310 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce FX 5200 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce FX 5200 vs Radeon HD 6310 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5200

The GeForce FX 5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $1,999.

AMD

Radeon HD 6310

The Radeon HD 6310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 122 points. Launch price was $180.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200 scores 8 versus the Radeon HD 6310's 122 — the Radeon HD 6310 leads by 1425%. The GeForce FX 5200 is built on Rankine while the Radeon HD 6310 uses TeraScale 3, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX 5200) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6310). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6310).

FeatureGeForce FX 5200Radeon HD 6310
G3D Mark Score
8
122+1425%
Architecture
Rankine
TeraScale 3
Process Node
5 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
21760+1600%
1280
Compute (TFLOPS)
104.8 TFLOPS+5358%
1.92 TFLOPS
ROPs
176+450%
32
TMUs
680+750%
80
L1 Cache
21.3 MB+6771%
0.31 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB+19100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce FX 5200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6310 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200Radeon HD 6310
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5200 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6310 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 6310 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5200 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6310. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX 5200) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6310) — the GeForce FX 5200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200Radeon HD 6310
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
96 MB+19100%
0.5 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5200 draws 575W versus the Radeon HD 6310's 186W — a 102.2% difference. The Radeon HD 6310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6310). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200Radeon HD 6310
TDP
575W
186W-68%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
152mm
Height
100mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
70
Perf/Watt
0.0
0.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5200 came in at $70, while the Radeon HD 6310 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6310 was 28.6% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GeForce FX 5200) vs 2.4 (Radeon HD 6310) — the Radeon HD 6310 offers 2300% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5200 (2025 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce FX 5200Radeon HD 6310
MSRP
$70
$50-29%
Performance per Dollar
0.1
2.4+2300%
Codename
GB202
Cayman
Release
January 30 2025
December 1 2011
Ranking
#3
#598

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.