GeForce FX 5200 vs Radeon HD 6310
GeForce FX 5200
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 6310
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce FX 5200 is positioned at rank 374 and the Radeon HD 6310 is on rank 300, so the Radeon HD 6310 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5200
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6310
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce FX 5200 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2011). The GeForce FX 5200 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6310 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6310 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1425% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5200.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5200 | Radeon HD 6310 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1425%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1425%) |
| Longevity | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) (5nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 6310 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $50 (vs $25), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 662.5% better value per dollar than the GeForce FX 5200.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5200 | Radeon HD 6310 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+662.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5200 and Radeon HD 6310
GeForce FX 5200
The GeForce FX 5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Radeon HD 6310
The Radeon HD 6310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 122 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200 scores 8 versus the Radeon HD 6310's 122 — the Radeon HD 6310 leads by 1425%. The GeForce FX 5200 is built on Rankine while the Radeon HD 6310 uses TeraScale 3, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX 5200) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6310). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6310).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | Radeon HD 6310 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8 | 122+1425% |
| Architecture | Rankine | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760+1600% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS+5358% | 1.92 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 176+450% | 32 |
| TMUs | 680+750% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 21.3 MB+6771% | 0.31 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+19100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | Radeon HD 6310 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5200 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6310 has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 6310 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX 5200) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6310) — the GeForce FX 5200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | Radeon HD 6310 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+19100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5200 draws 575W versus the Radeon HD 6310's 186W — a 102.2% difference. The Radeon HD 6310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6310). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | Radeon HD 6310 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 186W-68% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 152mm | — |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce FX 5200 launched at $70 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the Radeon HD 6310 launched at $50 and now averages $50. The GeForce FX 5200 costs 50% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (GeForce FX 5200) vs 2.4 (Radeon HD 6310) — the Radeon HD 6310 offers 700% better value. The GeForce FX 5200 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | Radeon HD 6310 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70 | $50-29% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-50% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3 | 2.4+700% |
| Codename | GB202 | Cayman |
| Release | January 30 2025 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #3 | #598 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce FX 5200 and Radeon HD 6310
