
GeForce FX 5200

Radeon HD 6310
GeForce FX 5200 vs Radeon HD 6310 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX 5200 vs Radeon HD 6310 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce FX 5200 vs Radeon HD 6310: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX 5200
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6310 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌40% HIGHER MSRP$70 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
- ❌209.1% higher power demand at 575W vs 186W.
Radeon HD 6310
2011Why buy it
- ✅200.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2035% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Draws 186W instead of 575W, a 389W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5200 vs Radeon HD 6310 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5200
The GeForce FX 5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Radeon HD 6310
The Radeon HD 6310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 122 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200 scores 8 versus the Radeon HD 6310's 122 — the Radeon HD 6310 leads by 1425%. The GeForce FX 5200 is built on Rankine while the Radeon HD 6310 uses TeraScale 3, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX 5200) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6310). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6310).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | Radeon HD 6310 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8 | 122+1425% |
| Architecture | Rankine | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760+1600% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS+5358% | 1.92 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 176+450% | 32 |
| TMUs | 680+750% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 21.3 MB+6771% | 0.31 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+19100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce FX 5200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6310 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | Radeon HD 6310 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5200 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6310 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 6310 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5200 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6310. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX 5200) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6310) — the GeForce FX 5200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | Radeon HD 6310 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+19100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5200 draws 575W versus the Radeon HD 6310's 186W — a 102.2% difference. The Radeon HD 6310 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6310). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | Radeon HD 6310 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 186W-68% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 152mm | — |
| Height | 100mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce FX 5200 came in at $70, while the Radeon HD 6310 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6310 was 28.6% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GeForce FX 5200) vs 2.4 (Radeon HD 6310) — the Radeon HD 6310 offers 2300% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5200 (2025 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | Radeon HD 6310 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70 | $50-29% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 2.4+2300% |
| Codename | GB202 | Cayman |
| Release | January 30 2025 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #3 | #598 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













