
GeForce FX 5200 vs GeForce FX 5200LE

GeForce FX 5200
Popular choices:

GeForce FX 5200LE
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce FX 5200 is positioned at rank 374 and the GeForce FX 5200LE is on rank 371, so the GeForce FX 5200LE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5200
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5200LE
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX 5200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 14.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce FX 5200LE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce FX 5200LE |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+14.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-14.3%) |
| Longevity | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) (5nm) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce FX 5200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $25 (vs $25), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 14.3% better value per dollar than the GeForce FX 5200LE.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce FX 5200LE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+14.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5200 and GeForce FX 5200LE

GeForce FX 5200
The GeForce FX 5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $1,999.

GeForce FX 5200LE
The GeForce FX 5200LE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200 scores 8 versus the GeForce FX 5200LE's 7 — the GeForce FX 5200 leads by 14.3%. The GeForce FX 5200 is built on Rankine while the GeForce FX 5200LE uses Rankine, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX 5200) vs 21,760 (GeForce FX 5200LE). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200) vs 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200LE). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 170 RT cores (GeForce FX 5200) vs 170 (GeForce FX 5200LE) with 680 Tensor cores vs 680.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce FX 5200LE |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8+14% | 7 |
| Architecture | Rankine | Rankine |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760 | 21760 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS | 104.8 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2407 MHz | 2407 MHz |
| ROPs | 176 | 176 |
| TMUs | 680 | 680 |
| L1 Cache | 21.3 MB | 21.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB | 96 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 170 | 170 |
| Tensor Cores | 680 | 680 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce FX 5200LE |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5200 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5200LE has 512 MB. The GeForce FX 5200LE offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce FX 5200LE |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB | 96 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200LE). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce FX 5200LE |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0a |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce FX 5200) vs No (GeForce FX 5200LE). Decoder: MPEG-2 Motion Compensation vs No. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5200) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5200LE).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce FX 5200LE |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 Motion Compensation | No |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5200 draws 575W versus the GeForce FX 5200LE's 575W — a 0% difference. The GeForce FX 5200LE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5200LE). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 152mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce FX 5200LE |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 575W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 152mm | 168mm |
| Height | 100mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | 65°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce FX 5200 launched at $70 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the GeForce FX 5200LE launched at $43 and now averages $25. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.3 (GeForce FX 5200) vs 0.3 (GeForce FX 5200LE) — the GeForce FX 5200LE offers 0% better value.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce FX 5200LE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70 | $43-39% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25 | $25 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Codename | GB202 | GB202 |
| Release | January 30 2025 | January 30 2025 |
| Ranking | #3 | #3 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.










