G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5200 vs GeForce4 Ti 4200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5200 vs GeForce4 Ti 4200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5200

2025

Why buy it

✅+33.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $129 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 279% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅32.8% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (680 vs 512).
✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌27.8% higher power demand at 575W vs 450W.

GeForce4 Ti 4200

2022

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Draws 450W instead of 575W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6 vs 8).
❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (512 vs 680), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
❌GeForce FX 5200 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌
184.3% HIGHER MSRP
$199 MSRPvs$70 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce FX 5200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 33.3% in PassMark G3D (8 vs 6), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce FX 5200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 170 vs 128 ray-tracing units and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2022. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce FX 5200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $129 cheaper on MSRP at $70 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 279% (0.1 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce FX 5200 vs GeForce4 Ti 4200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5200

The GeForce FX 5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $1,999.

GeForce4 Ti 4200

The GeForce4 Ti 4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 20 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2235 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 16384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 128 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $1,599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200 scores 8 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4200's 6 — the GeForce FX 5200 leads by 33.3%. The GeForce FX 5200 is built on Rankine while the GeForce4 Ti 4200 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX 5200) vs 16,384 (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200) vs 82.58 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Boost clocks: 2407 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 170 RT cores (GeForce FX 5200) vs 128 (GeForce4 Ti 4200) with 680 Tensor cores vs 512.

Feature	GeForce FX 5200	GeForce4 Ti 4200
G3D Mark Score	8+33%	6
Architecture	Rankine	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	21760+33%	16384
Compute (TFLOPS)	104.8 TFLOPS+27%	82.58 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2407 MHz	2520 MHz+5%
ROPs	176	176
TMUs	680+33%	512
L1 Cache	21.3 MB+33%	16 MB
L2 Cache	96 MB+33%	72 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	170+33%	128
Tensor Cores	680+33%	512

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce FX 5200	GeForce4 Ti 4200
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5200 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 Ti 4200 carries 512 MB. GeForce4 Ti 4200 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5200 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4200. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX 5200) vs 72 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4200) — the GeForce FX 5200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX 5200	GeForce4 Ti 4200
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	96 MB+33%	72 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce FX 5200	GeForce4 Ti 4200
DirectX	9.0a+11%	8.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
OpenGL	1.5	1.5
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce FX 5200) vs None (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Decoder: MPEG-2 Motion Compensation vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5200) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 Ti 4200).

Feature	GeForce FX 5200	GeForce4 Ti 4200
Encoder	None	None
Decoder	MPEG-2 Motion Compensation	None
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5200 draws 575W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4200's 450W — a 24.4% difference. The GeForce4 Ti 4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4200). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 152mm vs 175mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 65.

Feature	GeForce FX 5200	GeForce4 Ti 4200
TDP	575W	450W-22%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	152mm	175mm
Height	100mm	100mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	70	65-7%
Perf/Watt	0.0	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5200 came in at $70, while the GeForce4 Ti 4200 launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5200 was 64.8% cheaper ($129 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GeForce FX 5200) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4200) — the GeForce FX 5200 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5200 (2025 vs 2022).

Feature	GeForce FX 5200	GeForce4 Ti 4200
MSRP	$70-65%	$199
Performance per Dollar	0.1	0.0
Codename	GB202	AD102
Release	January 30 2025	September 20 2022
Ranking	#3	#4

Search GeForce FX 5200 on Amazon

Search GeForce4 Ti 4200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.