Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce FX 5200 vs Quadro FX 500/600 PCI

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5200

2025Core: 2017 MHzBoost: 2407 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 500/600 PCI

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce FX 5200 vs Quadro FX 500/600 PCI Performance Spectrum

GeForce FX 5200
0.125 GB 575
8
0.0%
brand logoGeForce 6200A
brand logoGeForce 256
brand logoGeForce PCX 5300
brand logoGeForce FX 5200LE
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Quadro FX 500/600 PCI
4 GB 189
14
+75.0%
brand logoGeForce FX 5200LE
brand logoGeForce FX Go 5200
brand logoGeForce FX 5600XT
brand logoGeForce FX 5200SE
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5200 vs Quadro FX 500/600 PCI FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
Quadro FX 500/600 PCI
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
Quadro FX 500/600 PCI
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
Quadro FX 500/600 PCI
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
Quadro FX 500/600 PCI
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
Quadro FX 500/600 PCI
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
Quadro FX 500/600 PCI
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
Quadro FX 500/600 PCI
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
Quadro FX 500/600 PCI
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
Quadro FX 500/600 PCI
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
Quadro FX 500/600 PCI
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

GeForce FX 5200 vs Quadro FX 500/600 PCI: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5200

2025

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • ✅Measures 152mm instead of 168mm, a 16mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8 vs 14).
  • ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌204.2% higher power demand at 575W vs 189W.

Quadro FX 500/600 PCI

2008

Why buy it

  • ✅+75% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅3100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 128 MB).
  • ✅Draws 189W instead of 575W, a 386W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
  • ❌10.5% longer card at 168mm vs 152mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 500/600 PCI is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 75% in PassMark G3D (14 vs 8), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce FX 5200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 55nm, 170 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2008. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro FX 500/600 PCI still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce FX 5200 vs Quadro FX 500/600 PCI Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5200

The GeForce FX 5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $1,999.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 500/600 PCI

The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200 scores 8 versus the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI's 14 — the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI leads by 75%. The GeForce FX 5200 is built on Rankine while the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI uses Tesla 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX 5200) vs 240 (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI).

FeatureGeForce FX 5200Quadro FX 500/600 PCI
G3D Mark Score
8
14+75%
Architecture
Rankine
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
5 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
21760+8967%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
104.8 TFLOPS+16746%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
176+450%
32
TMUs
680+750%
80
L2 Cache
96 MB+38300%
0.25 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce FX 5200 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200Quadro FX 500/600 PCI
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5200 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 500/600 PCI gives you 3100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5200 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX 5200) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) — the GeForce FX 5200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200Quadro FX 500/600 PCI
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
4 GB+3100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
96 MB+38300%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200) vs 9_0a (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200Quadro FX 500/600 PCI
DirectX
9.0a
9_0a
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5200 draws 575W versus the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI's 189W — a 101% difference. The Quadro FX 500/600 PCI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200) vs 350W (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 152mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200Quadro FX 500/600 PCI
TDP
575W
189W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
152mm
168mm
Height
100mm
—
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
70
—
Perf/Watt
0.0
0.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5200 came in at $70, while the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI launched at $0. On MSRP, Quadro FX 500/600 PCI was 100+% cheaper ($70 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GeForce FX 5200) vs Infinity (Quadro FX 500/600 PCI) — the Quadro FX 500/600 PCI offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5200 (2025 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce FX 5200Quadro FX 500/600 PCI
MSRP
$70
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
0.1
Infinity
Codename
GB202
GT200B
Release
January 30 2025
November 11 2008
Ranking
#3
#815
Search GeForce FX 5200 on AmazonSearch Quadro FX 500/600 PCI on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.