Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce FX 5200 vs GeForce Go 6200

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5200

2025Core: 2017 MHzBoost: 2407 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6200

2012Core: 902 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce FX 5200 vs GeForce Go 6200 Performance Spectrum

GeForce FX 5200
0.125 GB 575
8
0.0%
brand logoGeForce 6200A
brand logoGeForce 256
brand logoGeForce PCX 5300
brand logoGeForce FX 5200LE
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
GeForce Go 6200
0.016 GB 65
15
+87.5%
brand logoGeForce FX Go 5200
brand logoGeForce FX 5200
brand logoGeForce FX 5600XT
brand logoGeForce FX Go5300
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5200 vs GeForce Go 6200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce Go 6200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce Go 6200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce Go 6200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce Go 6200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce Go 6200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce Go 6200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce Go 6200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce Go 6200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce Go 6200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
GeForce FX 5200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
1080P
GeForce Go 6200
low1 FPS
medium1 FPS
high1 FPS
ultra1 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

GeForce FX 5200 vs GeForce Go 6200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5200

2025

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅681.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (128 MB vs 16 MB).
  • ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8 vs 15).
  • ❌784.6% higher power demand at 575W vs 65W.

GeForce Go 6200

2012

Why buy it

  • ✅+87.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • ✅Draws 65W instead of 575W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 16 MB vs 128 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2012 hardware with 16 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $70 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce Go 6200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 87.5% in PassMark G3D (15 vs 8), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce FX 5200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 128 MB vs 16 MB of VRAM, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 170 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2012. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5200 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce Go 6200 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce FX 5200 vs GeForce Go 6200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5200

The GeForce FX 5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $1,999.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6200

The GeForce Go 6200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 5 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 902 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15 points. Launch price was $99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200 scores 8 versus the GeForce Go 6200's 15 — the GeForce Go 6200 leads by 87.5%. The GeForce FX 5200 is built on Rankine while the GeForce Go 6200 uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX 5200) vs 384 (GeForce Go 6200). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200) vs 0.6927 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6200).

FeatureGeForce FX 5200GeForce Go 6200
G3D Mark Score
8
15+88%
Architecture
Rankine
Kepler
Process Node
5 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
21760+5567%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
104.8 TFLOPS+15029%
0.6927 TFLOPS
ROPs
176+1000%
16
TMUs
680+2025%
32
L1 Cache
21.3 MB+70900%
0.03 MB
L2 Cache
96 MB+38300%
0.25 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce FX 5200GeForce Go 6200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5200 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 6200 carries 16 MB. GeForce FX 5200 gives you 681.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5200 and 128-bit on the GeForce Go 6200. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX 5200) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce Go 6200) — the GeForce FX 5200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200GeForce Go 6200
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB+681%
0.016 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
96 MB+38300%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200) vs 10.0 (GeForce Go 6200). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200GeForce Go 6200
DirectX
9.0a
10.0+11%
Vulkan
N/A
None
OpenGL
1.5
2.1+40%
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce FX 5200) vs No (GeForce Go 6200). Decoder: MPEG-2 Motion Compensation vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5200) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce Go 6200).

FeatureGeForce FX 5200GeForce Go 6200
Encoder
None
No
Decoder
MPEG-2 Motion Compensation
PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5200 draws 575W versus the GeForce Go 6200's 65W — a 159.4% difference. The GeForce Go 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200) vs 350W (GeForce Go 6200). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 152mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce FX 5200GeForce Go 6200
TDP
575W
65W-89%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
152mm
0mm
Height
100mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70-7%
75°C
Perf/Watt
0.0
0.2
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce FX 5200 (2025 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce FX 5200GeForce Go 6200
MSRP
$70
—
Codename
GB202
GK107
Release
January 30 2025
June 5 2012
Ranking
#3
#837
Search GeForce FX 5200 on AmazonSearch GeForce Go 6200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.