G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5200 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5200 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5200

2025

Why buy it

✅+14.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $229 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 388.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Measures 152mm instead of 216mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌283.3% higher power demand at 575W vs 150W.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

2010

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
✅Draws 150W instead of 575W, a 425W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7 vs 8).
❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
327.1% HIGHER MSRP
$299 MSRPvs$70 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
❌42.1% longer card at 216mm vs 152mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce FX 5200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 14.3% in PassMark G3D (8 vs 7), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce FX 5200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 40nm, 170 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2010. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce FX 5200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $229 cheaper on MSRP at $70 vs $299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 388.2% (0.1 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce FX 5200 vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5200

The GeForce FX 5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $1,999.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7 points. Launch price was $160.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200 scores 8 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE's 7 — the GeForce FX 5200 leads by 14.3%. The GeForce FX 5200 is built on Rankine while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE uses Fermi, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX 5200) vs 288 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200) vs 0.7488 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE).

Feature	GeForce FX 5200	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
G3D Mark Score	8+14%	7
Architecture	Rankine	Fermi
Process Node	5 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	21760+7456%	288
Compute (TFLOPS)	104.8 TFLOPS+13896%	0.7488 TFLOPS
ROPs	176+450%	32
TMUs	680+1317%	48
L1 Cache	21.3 MB+5505%	0.38 MB
L2 Cache	96 MB+19100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce FX 5200	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5200 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE carries 512 MB. GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5200 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX 5200) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) — the GeForce FX 5200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX 5200	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
VRAM Capacity	0.125 GB	0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	96 MB+19100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce FX 5200	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
DirectX	9.0a+11%	8.1
Vulkan	N/A	None
OpenGL	1.5+15%	1.3
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce FX 5200) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Decoder: MPEG-2 Motion Compensation vs No.

Feature	GeForce FX 5200	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
Encoder	None	No
Decoder	MPEG-2 Motion Compensation	No
Codecs	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5200 draws 575W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE's 150W — a 117.2% difference. The GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 152mm vs 216mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 65°C.

Feature	GeForce FX 5200	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
TDP	575W	150W-74%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	152mm	216mm
Height	100mm	111mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	70	65°C-7%
Perf/Watt	0.0	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5200 came in at $70, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE launched at $299. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5200 was 76.6% cheaper ($229 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GeForce FX 5200) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE) — the GeForce FX 5200 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5200 (2025 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce FX 5200	GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
MSRP	$70-77%	$299
Performance per Dollar	0.1	0.0
Codename	GB202	GF104
Release	January 30 2025	November 15 2010
Ranking	#3	#683

Search GeForce FX 5200 on Amazon

Search GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.