
GeForce FX 5200

GeForce FX 5600
GeForce FX 5200 vs GeForce FX 5600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX 5200 vs GeForce FX 5600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce FX 5200 vs GeForce FX 5600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX 5200
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 75.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 152mm instead of 180mm, a 28mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8 vs 13).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌283.3% higher power demand at 575W vs 150W.
GeForce FX 5600
2011Why buy it
- ✅+62.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 575W, a 425W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌185.7% HIGHER MSRP$200 MSRPvs$70 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).
- ❌18.4% longer card at 180mm vs 152mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5200 vs GeForce FX 5600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5200
The GeForce FX 5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $1,999.

GeForce FX 5600
The GeForce FX 5600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200 scores 8 versus the GeForce FX 5600's 13 — the GeForce FX 5600 leads by 62.5%. The GeForce FX 5200 is built on Rankine while the GeForce FX 5600 uses Rankine, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 21,760 (GeForce FX 5200) vs 336 (GeForce FX 5600). Raw compute: 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200) vs 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5600).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8 | 13+63% |
| Architecture | Rankine | Rankine |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 21760+6376% | 336 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 104.8 TFLOPS+9524% | 1.089 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 176+450% | 32 |
| TMUs | 680+1114% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 21.3 MB+4741% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+19100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5200 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5600 carries 256 MB. GeForce FX 5600 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5200 and 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5600. L2 Cache: 96 MB (GeForce FX 5200) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce FX 5600) — the GeForce FX 5200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.25 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+19100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5600). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0a |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce FX 5200) vs No (GeForce FX 5600). Decoder: MPEG-2 Motion Compensation vs No. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5200) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5600).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | MPEG-2 Motion Compensation | No |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5200 draws 575W versus the GeForce FX 5600's 150W — a 117.2% difference. The GeForce FX 5600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5600). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 152mm vs 180mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 575W | 150W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 152mm | 180mm |
| Height | 100mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.0 | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce FX 5200 came in at $70, while the GeForce FX 5600 launched at $200. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5200 was 65% cheaper ($130 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GeForce FX 5200) vs 0.1 (GeForce FX 5600) — the GeForce FX 5600 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5200 (2025 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200 | GeForce FX 5600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $70-65% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Codename | GB202 | GF114 |
| Release | January 30 2025 | May 17 2011 |
| Ranking | #3 | #605 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













